I was my first game at Bryant-Denny and the facility is beautiful!
Defensively, we were good, but not great. Having said that, I can't imagine a more difficult team to play with so many inexperienced players. The UH offense is pretty good and they wore us out with the shuffle pass.
Offensively we were fairly good. I have seen a lot of commentary on this subject. This my take on the subject. After watching CMS for the last three years, I think we can say he is conservative by nature. Nothing wrong with that, Bryant and Stallings were pretty conservative and they now have statues in front of the stadium.
It was good to see CMS go for it a fourth down a couple of times last night, but that is about as risky as it gets and that is what most folks are talking about, in my opinion. Even CMS jokes about throwing to the tight ends in press conferences. We did throw to the TEs last night and it worked. I understand you have to have the right players to try different things and make them work.
I don't think I have ever seen a screen pass from CMS. I may be wrong and probably am, but it is just an observation. We may sometimes throw to the tailback, more as a safety valve, and it is usually successful. I guess I am just wondering why we appear to have a limited play book when we now have the players to run just about any kind of play we need too. An end around play almost seems like a trick play to me.
As long as the wins keep coming, it's OK with me. It seems to me the offense is limited by our own imagination. I am certainly not advocating running a buch of trick plays, but do we have any? It makes us easier for opponents to prepare for when we are no threat to try anything different or risky.
I'm sure some on this site can and probably will punch holes in all of my comments and that is fine, after all, it is just my opinion.
Defensively, we were good, but not great. Having said that, I can't imagine a more difficult team to play with so many inexperienced players. The UH offense is pretty good and they wore us out with the shuffle pass.
Offensively we were fairly good. I have seen a lot of commentary on this subject. This my take on the subject. After watching CMS for the last three years, I think we can say he is conservative by nature. Nothing wrong with that, Bryant and Stallings were pretty conservative and they now have statues in front of the stadium.
It was good to see CMS go for it a fourth down a couple of times last night, but that is about as risky as it gets and that is what most folks are talking about, in my opinion. Even CMS jokes about throwing to the tight ends in press conferences. We did throw to the TEs last night and it worked. I understand you have to have the right players to try different things and make them work.
I don't think I have ever seen a screen pass from CMS. I may be wrong and probably am, but it is just an observation. We may sometimes throw to the tailback, more as a safety valve, and it is usually successful. I guess I am just wondering why we appear to have a limited play book when we now have the players to run just about any kind of play we need too. An end around play almost seems like a trick play to me.
As long as the wins keep coming, it's OK with me. It seems to me the offense is limited by our own imagination. I am certainly not advocating running a buch of trick plays, but do we have any? It makes us easier for opponents to prepare for when we are no threat to try anything different or risky.
I'm sure some on this site can and probably will punch holes in all of my comments and that is fine, after all, it is just my opinion.