Poll: Names on the back of the Jersey's, Yes or No!

[Ldlane]

Here's an oldie, but a goodie!

 

[bamabelle1991]

YES!!

 

[Jessica4Bama]

Yes.

 

[crimsonaudio]

Technically, it's not the offseason yet...

But yes.

 

[Relayer]

I'd prefer jerseys without names.

 

[bayoutider]

I think they should have pictures on the jersey since the helmet hides their faces.

 

[Ldlane]

I think they should have pictures on the jersey since the helmet hides their faces.

That would be an NCAA violation!

 

[bamacon]

He Hate Me

This should come up about 48 hours after NSD

 

[Jordan54]

I vote yes.

 

[skipster63]

Yes

 

[BDE]

Na. Then you just wind up with something like Lutzenchickenjerkin or whatever the heck his name is.:conf2:

 

[dave12]

With names...........YES:biggrin2:


RTR:BigA:

 

[CrimsonSEC]

I voted yes...and while we're at it, let's put little gold stars or small elephants on the helmets when they make a good play.

 

[TheOysterMan]

only if we can have white helmets and a real live elephant for a mascot

 

[Heisman4Bama]

only if we can have white helmets and a real live elephant for a mascot

Oh would the opposing team wouldnt even want to walk out of the tunnel then, especially if we have it right outside. The only problem would be our insane crowd noise of 100,000+ screaming might scare him. But otherwise you should send in a letter of recomendation to University.

 

[silentsam74]

I voted yes...and while we're at it, let's put little gold stars or small elephants on the helmets when they make a good play.

I like the idea. But, not the type of stickers. When I was in school they used to hand out a skull and crossbones sticker for a big hit. That would be cool.

But, for anyone that voted no on the names on the jerseys, how about Army's jerseys today. Instead of names on the back, it said West Point.

 

[JessN]

I don't understand the argument for not having them, frankly.

They serve a purpose (helping announcers/family members track who is in the game) and the common argument against them -- that not having them somehow promotes team unity, since everyone is "equal" because they're just a number -- is both antiquated and not rooted in the real world. You don't have to have "JONES" on the back of #8's jersey for the rest of the Alabama team to recognize he's the best wide receiver. They know.

The teams that don't have them are the ones with the issues, IMO. And the "West Point" thing on the Army uniforms, to me, makes it look like a high school jersey where the school wants to have something there but can't afford personalization for each player.

 

[Bama Football]

Heck yes!

 

[CrimsonPride]

I vote yes. The names are really helpful in identifying a player especially with the way CNS likes to give the same number to more than one player.

 

[CrimsonPaul]

Yes to names, no to stickers. Always thought stickers were "Look at ME!" especially QBs with a helmet covered with them.