The point i was going for was explaining to myself how losing to Umass was a good loss.....oh because it was in the NIT and on the road in a tough enviroment against GREAT TEAM!!!!
A great team???:conf2:
The point i was going for was explaining to myself how losing to Umass was a good loss.....oh because it was in the NIT and on the road in a tough enviroment against GREAT TEAM!!!!
It's sad that Bama basketball fans are reduced to trying to find some positives in the "effort" displayed while losing in the opening round of the NIT to an Atlantic-10 team that previously had not won a postseason game in 11 years. More than sad -- downright pitiful.
The sun will come out tomorrow.
.. while losing in the opening round of the NIT to an Atlantic-10 team that previously had not won a postseason game in 11 years.
I don't know man...I've heard all year how we have SO much talent but have underachieved, but from what I saw last night...UMASS was more talented and quicker than our team, but our guys played hard...down to the last second. I give them props. What you have with Alabama is a supporting cast without the star.
I don't know man...I've heard all year how we have SO much talent but have underachieved, but from what I saw last night...UMASS was more talented and quicker than our team, but our guys played hard...down to the last second. I give them props. What you have with Alabama is a supporting cast without the star.
I agree. Another major difference between the two teams is experience. UMASS is a senior-junior laden team; whereas, we have a senior (not 100% due to personal tradegies), a junior (not 50% due to injuries), a JUCO transfer and the rest are freshmen and sophomores. Last night, UMASS played only 3 underclassmen (2 came off the bench). In contrast, BAMA played 4 freshmen, 3 sophomores and only 2 upperclassmen. The teams in the SEC with team make-ups similar to ours, had similar or worse records than us. In close games and on the road, experience and veteran leadership on the floor make the difference. We did not have that this year. This is not an excuse but a fact. Case in point, the Dallas Mavericks were in a position to close out the series and win the NBA Championship but were rattled and taken totally out of their game by an experienced, veteran supporting cast of Shaq, Mourning, Payton and Walker.
That being said, I believe our underclassmen grew up some last night. They gave it their best, but came up short. I think Steele not playing and Gee fouling out showed the younger players that they could step in and pick up the slack if one of your teammates is out or having an off night. Gee, Hollinger, Hendrix, Riley and Steele will be the upperclassmen next year and with Tubbs, Torrence and Jemison getting more playing time in the last month, we should see a much improved and more cohesive unit on the floor.
There are other "young" teams who are sound fundamentally - they move their feet on defense, they get back on transition, and they don't make sloppy, no-think passes. The "youth" excuse has been worked to death. That's not our problem...
I knew we were in trouble with xCMS when we started celebrating moral victories and first halves, and then we tried to convince ourselves that Duke was a good football team (yes that did happen). Now we're doing it with basketball.