That kept it from being 38-17 by the end of the game.Great win and Milroe really impressed me with the progress he's made. He just kept slinging it after that interception. I am still mad about that terrible call on the blindside block.
That kept it from being 38-17 by the end of the game.Great win and Milroe really impressed me with the progress he's made. He just kept slinging it after that interception. I am still mad about that terrible call on the blindside block.
While technically* the talking heads can say it was a “blindside block†(bump being more accurate), you have to ask yourself simply “why was the blindside block rule (and targeting for that matter) implemented?†The answer - “to remove dangerous hits from the game, particularly for defenseless playersâ€Â. The goal is to remove that “de-cleating blockâ€Â. So tell me, what was so dangerous about that hit that warranted a flag? Nothing, absolute nothing.Great win and Milroe really impressed me with the progress he's made. He just kept slinging it after that interception. I am still mad about that terrible call on the blindside block.
NO.... DON'T run the ball! We needed to be in victory formation. "Run the ball" is what Miami did that got them beat. I know it doesn't happen often but it CAN happen. We were in shotgun, too, so think about how our center has been snapping the ball. I don't want there to be TWO exchanges and then a RB running with the ball into the scrum when there is another option: victory formation three times... game over. I want the QB to take a snap, have his buddies huddled around him in case something goes wrong with that one exchange, then I want him to kneel down and hand the ball to the official.I don't recall him saying that. I do know Saban didn't like the play. Running the ball was the best thing at that point, to run the clock out.
The roughing the passer call was just as bad.While technically* the talking heads can say it was a “blindside block†(bump being more accurate), you have to ask yourself simply “why was the blindside block rule (and targeting for that matter) implemented?†The answer - “to remove dangerous hits from the game, particularly for defenseless playersâ€Â. The goal is to remove that “de-cleating blockâ€Â. So tell me, what was so dangerous about that hit that warranted a flag? Nothing, absolute nothing.
We have heard time and again that “holding is a judgement call. We could call it on every play. We use our judgment/discernment to determine whether or not an advantage is gained.“ So, if that is true, what advantage was gained by calling this marginal at best “blindside blockâ€Â, especially when it had no impact on the play itself? Not a darn thing.
This was not an official making a call. This was an official “looking†for something to call. And it was horrendous.
That call was so weak.The roughing the passer call was just as bad.
NO.... DON'T run the ball! We needed to be in victory formation. "Run the ball" is what Miami did that got them beat. I know it doesn't happen often but it CAN happen. We were in shotgun, too, so think about how our center has been snapping the ball. I don't want there to be TWO exchanges and then a RB running with the ball into the scrum when there is another option: victory formation three times... game over. I want the QB to take a snap, have his buddies huddled around him in case something goes wrong with that one exchange, then I want him to kneel down and hand the ball to the official.
I have no idea why we didn't do this after the McClellan first down catch and run. It should be automatic once the clock reaches a certain point (and we should have this figured out and memorized), and hopefully with the Miami debacle we will do that (victory formation) from now on any time we can.
I can see where you're coming fromI think* I know what happened though it has never been addressed at this point. It boils down to having situational awareness.
There should be no confusion... that's exactly what should have happened... take a knee three times. You're exactly right.I'm still confused about the final four plays of the game, especially that first down following the McClellan first down. I didn't understand the pass since it was giving A&M a 4th timeout. But also, there were 7 seconds remaining on the 4th down play where Milroe rolled out and threw the ball deep to kill the clock. So, a run on 1st down would have run more than 7 seconds off the clock, so then why not just take a knee three times after the McClellan 1st down?
There should be no confusion... that's exactly what should have happened... take a knee three times. You're exactly right.
I believe Jalen got excited about the uncovered receiver, or as CB4 suggested maybe he was thinking that he needed to run a play quickly so as to prevent a review of the previous play that he thought might not go our way (he may not have gotten a good look at it; other players may have been saying "hurry, hurry... we don't really know). No matter what the thought process was... it was wrong. Three knees and the game ends.
I get that. It was the quote I asked about. I didn't recall Milroe saying that. It didn't make sense to me.NO.... DON'T run the ball! We needed to be in victory formation. "Run the ball" is what Miami did that got them beat. I know it doesn't happen often but it CAN happen. We were in shotgun, too, so think about how our center has been snapping the ball. I don't want there to be TWO exchanges and then a RB running with the ball into the scrum when there is another option: victory formation three times... game over. I want the QB to take a snap, have his buddies huddled around him in case something goes wrong with that one exchange, then I want him to kneel down and hand the ball to the official.
I have no idea why we didn't do this after the McClellan first down catch and run. It should be automatic once the clock reaches a certain point (and we should have this figured out and memorized), and hopefully with the Miami debacle we will do that (victory formation) from now on any time we can.
Just look at some in the Alabama fan base - they are still whining about JM, some giving "faint praise", usually with caveats. It's certainly not all, but a significant segment. If TS was starting and performing as well as JM, they would be ecstatic, with little to say about his imperfections.On occasion, I like to take a peek at other teams forums. I Almost spit my drink out when one Aggie fan complained that the Refs were one of the reasons they lost !!! Some folks never cease to amaze me !!!!
Agree 100%. I mentioned on Facebook how Jalen had improved. My cousin and a friend nearly ran me off. LOL It was brutal. Listening to them, one would think it was 3 weeks ago. Even the win wasn't good enough.Just look at some in the Alabama fan base - they are still whining about JM, some giving "faint praise", usually with caveats. It's certainly not all, but a significant segment. If TS was starting and performing as well as JM, they would be ecstatic, with little to say about his imperfections.
There are always areas of improvement for any college QB, guys running open but not seen, a throw off-target here and there, etc. Many are just waiting for the next mistake.
You’re so wrong, Burger King, but have it your own way. I pull for JM as hard as you do. But I tell it as I see. He has a lot of room for improvement. That is just the truth.Just look at some in the Alabama fan base - they are still whining about JM, some giving "faint praise", usually with caveats. It's certainly not all, but a significant segment. If TS was starting and performing as well as JM, they would be ecstatic, with little to say about his imperfections.
There are always areas of improvement for any college QB, guys running open but not seen, a throw off-target here and there, etc. Many are just waiting for the next mistake.
Just look at some in the Alabama fan base - they are still whining about JM, some giving "faint praise", usually with caveats. It's certainly not all, but a significant segment. If TS was starting and performing as well as JM, they would be ecstatic, with little to say about his imperfections.
There are always areas of improvement for any college QB, guys running open but not seen, a throw off-target here and there, etc. Many are just waiting for the next mistake.
Just look at some in the Alabama fan base - they are still whining about JM, some giving "faint praise", usually with caveats. It's certainly not all, but a significant segment. If TS was starting and performing as well as JM, they would be ecstatic, with little to say about his imperfections.
There are always areas of improvement for any college QB, guys running open but not seen, a throw off-target here and there, etc. Many are just waiting for the next mistake.
Just look at some in the Alabama fan base - they are still whining about JM, some giving "faint praise", usually with caveats. It's certainly not all, but a significant segment. If TS was starting and performing as well as JM, they would be ecstatic, with little to say about his imperfections.
There are always areas of improvement for any college QB, guys running open but not seen, a throw off-target here and there, etc. Many are just waiting for the next mistake.
Never EVER watch a Bama game in a Nashville bar. Just a pitiful practice. Any bar for that matter, but especially Nashville. Been there. Done that. Not again.Thank you for the explanation. I watched the game in a bar in Nashville while away from home and I couldn't hear what the announcers were saying.
Just look at some in the Alabama fan base - they are still whining about JM, some giving "faint praise", usually with caveats. It's certainly not all, but a significant segment. If TS was starting and performing as well as JM, they would be ecstatic, with little to say about his imperfections.
There are always areas of improvement for any college QB, guys running open but not seen, a throw off-target here and there, etc. Many are just waiting for the next mistake.