Re: Should he stay, change or go?
When it comes to the University of Alabama and stability, they really have no connection.
Like a lot of fans, I was raised watching and cheering for Bama football, and I’ve been a fan for 27+ years. I’m very disturbed by the fans and possibly the University itself calling for Coach Mike Shula’s head, not only mere moments after the defeat by Auburn, but since the first loss this 2006 season all the way through.
Now we have speculation that he may lose his job or be forced to make changes to his staff? Change is good when it comes to looking at your mistakes and deciding on what means are necessary to better the outcome and I could even see some staff changes; but when you talk about firing a coach because the blame is placed on his shoulders for a program not measuring up to its great history and tradition…that’s plain crazy!
If he’s fired, it seems like the University is more interested in turning away from stability and structure and tearing down the house for a quick rebuild, as opposed to sticking with a coach both win, lose, or draw. Most of the coaches Alabama has had in the past years only barely have time to get their hands into the program, let alone their fingernails, and suddenly they’re booted because they don’t measure up. It’s silly, but people actually expect Bear Bryant in every coach. Last time I checked The Bear was a legend, and legends don’t come around that often; otherwise they wouldn’t be deemed as such.
You look at teams all across the nation, especially in the SEC, and you have a coach’s face for each individual college team. For Arkansas you have Houston Nutt, Philip Fulmer for Tennessee, and Auburn has Tommy Tuberville. But when it comes to Alabama, there’s really no name or face because you could stumble for a good five minutes naming all the coaches they’ve had for years. Plus, the scenario isn't one coach died to be replaced by another. Instead, it’s all politics and belly aching!
It’s sad to feel jerked around as a fan, like this. Aren’t we privileged to be fans, anyway? You hear “fans†in the stadium “booing†Coach Shula on national television because they don’t like the play calls, or because a player didn’t react on the field the way the fan feels they would if in the same situation. Plus, most of the fussing over Shula is speculation over what happens behind closed doors. The typical fan is now saying “oh, he’s a great guy, but his coaching style sucksâ€Â. Who’s played on the field for Coach Shula? The players.
If this is the way college football fans are going to change Tradition and help nosedive the University and its program into the ground, I hate to think I’m going down with this ship. Sure I could jump it, but I'm not a quitter, either.
For what it’s worth, Roll Tide, anyways! :BigA: