Possible Issues Within LSU Coaching Staff Brewing in Baton Rouge?

CrimsonForce

Hall of Fame
Dec 20, 2012
12,757
94
67
Until they get to the Alabama game. They hate Alabama. Even if it the only game that gets their attention, it will get their attention.
Don't you think Alabama hates LSU equally? I'm not concerned about the LSU game this year. It doesn't matter how much hate or emotion they conjure up. That only gets you so far and by the time the Alabama game comes I predict that most of their players and coaches are going to have quit on the season..
 
Last edited:

KrAzY3

Hall of Fame
Jan 18, 2006
10,966
5,480
187
45
kraizy.art
I think everyone just assumes this LSU has talent like they do most years but from watching their games I don't see it. They have talent in spots but that's no different than just about every team in this league. Also consider their 2 best players have been sitting out, protecting their NFL future, and I'd say this years LSU team has on field talent on par with a team like Miss St or UF.
I think sometimes it is easy to loose track of how talented some SEC programs are, just because the on field results haven't shown it. Florida for example is often loaded with future NFL talent, just like LSU. That is the measure I hold them to. Alabama and Ohio State might do a far better job of turning NFL talent into college wins, but that doesn't mean Florida, LSU, and even Miami don't have enough talent to win game. Yes, LSU is a mess, but just start looking up the guys they do have. You'll see a lot of people recruited by Saban, 4 and 5 stars, they have the talent. I've had this discussion about Florida in the past. Poor on field results and unrealized potential in those cases doesn't mean they lack talent.

There is no question at all in my mind, none, that the right coaching staff at LSU wouldn't have lost any games.
 

Pilot172000

1st Team
Sep 25, 2017
455
10
37
Winnsboro, LA
LSU hates Alabama more than anyone else in the SEC not named Old Maid and its solely based off of bridesmaid syndrome. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that you don't hire an Athletic director whose sole claim to fame is Men's Lacrosse. They were so talented and deep in football ten years ago, they actually thought they could hire a "basketball" Athletic Director to make the department more complete. The only problem with that is Joe Alleva was never ever the reason Duke was good at basketball. Now that the program has withered in to nothing and they can't figure out why.
 

B1GTide

TideFans Legend
Apr 13, 2012
47,874
55,183
187
I think sometimes it is easy to loose track of how talented some SEC programs are, just because the on field results haven't shown it. Florida for example is often loaded with future NFL talent, just like LSU. That is the measure I hold them to. Alabama and Ohio State might do a far better job of turning NFL talent into college wins, but that doesn't mean Florida, LSU, and even Miami don't have enough talent to win game. Yes, LSU is a mess, but just start looking up the guys they do have. You'll see a lot of people recruited by Saban, 4 and 5 stars, they have the talent. I've had this discussion about Florida in the past. Poor on field results and unrealized potential in those cases doesn't mean they lack talent.

There is no question at all in my mind, none, that the right coaching staff at LSU wouldn't have lost any games.
I think that it is fair to hold them to that standard as long as the expectation be something less than "win a championship or you have failed". LSU is in a rebuilding year - for LSU. That means that we shouldn't consider them a national championship contender with a first year head coach (to them), a new offensive coordinator and a bunch of new starters all over the field. But there is no excuse for their poor play.

It is one thing to say "we can't compete with Alabama right now because we need time to install new personnel and systems". It is another to use that as an excuse for their low level of play. They didn't lose to Troy because of their different coaches or players being new to the system. They lost because their new coaches and players are not competent.
 

B1GTide

TideFans Legend
Apr 13, 2012
47,874
55,183
187
Don't think Alabama hates LSU equally?
I don't think so. I don't think that Alabama hates Auburn or TN equally, either. Those 3 teams really hate Alabama, and Alabama seems to be fairly ambivalent about them as opponents.
 

CrimsonForce

Hall of Fame
Dec 20, 2012
12,757
94
67
I think sometimes it is easy to loose track of how talented some SEC programs are, just because the on field results haven't shown it. Florida for example is often loaded with future NFL talent, just like LSU. That is the measure I hold them to. Alabama and Ohio State might do a far better job of turning NFL talent into college wins, but that doesn't mean Florida, LSU, and even Miami don't have enough talent to win game. Yes, LSU is a mess, but just start looking up the guys they do have. You'll see a lot of people recruited by Saban, 4 and 5 stars, they have the talent. I've had this discussion about Florida in the past. Poor on field results and unrealized potential in those cases doesn't mean they lack talent.

There is no question at all in my mind, none, that the right coaching staff at LSU wouldn't have lost any games.
This is quite confusing to use Florida as an example of a loaded roster that under-performs on the field. McElwain is 16-3 in the SEC since joining UF and they've won the East the last 2 years.

I'm not saying that LSU is devoid of talent. I'm saying they used to be on the level of Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc. IMO they no longer are. They've done a terrible job of recruiting for their needs, a lot of players have left the program and the 2 best players (by far) are not playing. Yes, on paper, they have some talented players but they're not developing those players and what they're actually putting on the field is not an elite roster. It's a roster on par with Miss St or UF - taking into account the suspensions and injuries for UF. It's very rare that a team goes 6-6 with a ton of NFL talent and elite 4 and 5 star players on their roster. I can't think of time that's happened. Sure, sometimes teams with elite rosters underachieve like Bama in 2010 but we still won 10 games. You don't go 6-6 with a top 5 roster in college football like LSU is going to do this year. Even Orgeron couldn't screw that up i.e. see last year..
 
Last edited:

CrimsonForce

Hall of Fame
Dec 20, 2012
12,757
94
67
I don't think so. I don't think that Alabama hates Auburn or TN equally, either. Those 3 teams really hate Alabama, and Alabama seems to be fairly ambivalent about them as opponents.
Putting semantics aside the game is played between the white lines and not on emotion. How much did Michigan hate OSU when you guys beat them down 42-13? Emotion is part of the game but at some point it comes down to the players on the field and LSU does not have the players to keep it close with Bama this year..
 

Ledsteplin

Hall of Fame
Nov 20, 2013
7,204
7,938
187
72
Florence, Alabama
I think sometimes it is easy to loose track of how talented some SEC programs are, just because the on field results haven't shown it. Florida for example is often loaded with future NFL talent, just like LSU. That is the measure I hold them to. Alabama and Ohio State might do a far better job of turning NFL talent into college wins, but that doesn't mean Florida, LSU, and even Miami don't have enough talent to win game. Yes, LSU is a mess, but just start looking up the guys they do have. You'll see a lot of people recruited by Saban, 4 and 5 stars, they have the talent. I've had this discussion about Florida in the past. Poor on field results and unrealized potential in those cases doesn't mean they lack talent.

There is no question at all in my mind, none, that the right coaching staff at LSU wouldn't have lost any games.
Exactly! And when someone brings up CNS's first year at Bama and the loss to Louisiana Monroe, I remind them CNS didn't inherit much talent. CEO did, and still has a mess after 5 games.
 

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
33,159
27,823
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
Remember how it seemed Fournette quit when the season was over? Have to wonder if Guice and/or Key do the same since they saw Coach O not have a problem with LF doing it last year.
Let me take the "wonder" out of it. These two players are being HAMMERED on local sports talk radio in Louisiana, or at least the part of Louisiana I'm in. There is a real concern coming out of the LSU camp that these two guys have packed it in for the season trying to keep themselves healthy for the NFL. I didn't watch most of the game. But obviously there were more than a few plays where Key took plays off "Randy Moss" style. Like did nothing.
 

B1GTide

TideFans Legend
Apr 13, 2012
47,874
55,183
187
Putting semantics aside the game is played between the white lines and not on emotion. How much did Michigan hate OSU when you guys beat them down 42-13? Emotion is part of the game but at some point it comes down to the players on the field and LSU does not have the players to keep it close with Bama this year..
Agreed
 
I don't, there is no way on earth Troy could beat LSU if LSU was reasonably competent. It's like a beating a guy in a boxing match when the much better fighter shows up completely drunk and can't stand. Did you win the fight? Yeah, ok sure... but we all know why. I mean I get that Troy is feeling good about themselves, but this is just another ULM scenario where one team has to shoot itself in the foot, repeatedly, in order for it to happen.
Now, that’s true. The LSU team that’s being field is who they are this year. It’s a straight up win in my opinion. LSU seems to have trouble with Troy seemingly every time they play.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro[emoji208]
 

KrAzY3

Hall of Fame
Jan 18, 2006
10,966
5,480
187
45
kraizy.art
I think that it is fair to hold them to that standard as long as the expectation be something less than "win a championship or you have failed". LSU is in a rebuilding year - for LSU. That means that we shouldn't consider them a national championship contender with a first year head coach (to them), a new offensive coordinator and a bunch of new starters all over the field. But there is no excuse for their poor play.
I agree with this completely. I think there's a big gap between expecting a team to perform up to their level of talent, and beating Saban for example.

This is quite confusing to use Florida as an example of a loaded roster that under-performs on the field. McElwain is 16-3 in the SEC since joining UF and they've won the East the last 2 years.
It is a little more confusing since you compared LSU to Florida's talent, while saying LSU didn't have that much talent. My point was and is that both LSU and Florida are loaded, and yes relative to their talent Florida has under-performed since UM left. 22-9 ain't that great, but the talent has been.

Let's give an example. Last year's recruiting class (according to Rivals), Alabama had a star average of 3.83. This compares to LSU at 3.54 and Florida at 3.36. Troy had a class rated at 2.11! The difference between Alabama, LSU, and Florida is negligible. The difference between LSU and Troy is not! If you go by percentage, you see that the difference between Troy and Florida is massive, while the difference between Alabama and Florida is really not substantial. The reason they are playing this poorly, and getting beat by Troy is not talent.
 
Last edited:

CrimsonForce

Hall of Fame
Dec 20, 2012
12,757
94
67
I agree with this completely. I think there's a big gap between expecting a team to perform up to their level of talent, and beating Saban for example.


It is a little more confusing since you compared LSU to Florida's talent, while saying LSU didn't have that much talent. My point was and is that both LSU and Florida are loaded, and yes relative to their talent Florida has under-performed since UM left. 22-9 ain't that great, but the talent has been.

Let's give an example. Last year Alabama according to Rivals had a star average of 3.83. This compares to LSU at 3.54 and Florida at 3.36. Troy had a class rated at 2.11! The difference between Alabama, LSU, and Florida is negligible. The difference between LSU and Troy is not! The reason they are playing this poorly, and getting beat by Troy is not talent.
I clearly stated that in my mind LSU and UF have similar talent this year due to UF's suspensions and injuries. If UF was completely healthy and didn't have any suspensions they'd clearly have a better roster than LSU this year. Also, you're comparison of average stars is completely flawed. You'd have to take out all the players from those recruiting classes who've left LSU and take out Guice and Key since they're not playing this year. Again, this is what my opinion of LSU this year is based upon - who they actually have playing on the field not who they recruited 3 or 4 years ago who may or may not be playing or even on the roster at all..
 

KrAzY3

Hall of Fame
Jan 18, 2006
10,966
5,480
187
45
kraizy.art
Also, you're comparison of average stars is completely flawed
Look at their roster, the talent is there. You do understand that part of coaching is coaching those guys up and preparing them to play, right? The entire point is that LSU is dropping the ball! Their job is to get the talent they have to get motivated and play well. They're not. LSU's second string should be able to beat Troy and is more talented than Troy is. That's all there is to it. You can't explain away the massive gap between LSU and Troy's talent. Troy averages 2 stars, LSU doesn't even recruit 2 stars! What part of that is hard to understand?
 

CrimsonForce

Hall of Fame
Dec 20, 2012
12,757
94
67
Look at their roster, the talent is there. You do understand that part of coaching is coaching those guys up and preparing them to play, right? The entire point is that LSU is dropping the ball! Their job is to get the talent they have to get motivated and play well. They're not. LSU's second string should be able to beat Troy and is more talented than Troy is. That's all there is to it. You can't explain away the massive gap between LSU and Troy's talent. Troy averages 2 stars, LSU doesn't even recruit 2 stars! What part of that is hard to understand?
I never said that LSU and Troy were close in talent. Has nothing to do with my opinion on this. They could've beat Troy and MSU and I'd be saying the same thing. Let me try to make this easy for you since you're struggling. During the Saban/Miles era at LSU you could put LSU's roster up against the best and it was comparable. Do you feel that's the still the case? The answer to that is an emphatic NO! LSU's roster this year does not compare to Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson etc whereas they have been comparable to the top teams for the last 10 years or so. They are at least a notch below the truly elite teams now. That's my point. My last post on this subject because you always move the goal posts when you don't agree or somebody proves your opinion wrong..
 

KrAzY3

Hall of Fame
Jan 18, 2006
10,966
5,480
187
45
kraizy.art
Let me try to make this easy for you since you're struggling. During the Saban/Miles era at LSU you could put LSU's roster up against the best and it was comparable. Do you feel that's the still the case?
https://www.sbnation.com/a/cfb-preview-2017/blue-chip-ratio
For the record LSU is third behind Alabama and Ohio State in blue chip recruits.

The simple fact of the matter is even if they lost half their blue chips, they'd still have more blue chips than Miss. State. You can say what ever you want about that, but that's the truth. I see the bad product as a complete and utter failure on the part of the coaches, nothing to do with a lack of talent. Their job is to select, motivate, and prepare those players. I've grown tired of the idea that if Alabama for instance dominates someone it is because they have more talent and conversely if another coach is struggling it is because he doesn't have enough. Sometimes team A is just better coached than team B. LSU coaching staff has serious issues, not serious player talent issues.
 
Last edited:

GrayTide

Hall of Fame
Nov 15, 2005
19,061
6,897
187
Greenbow, Alabama
I agree with KrAzY, that the onous is on the coaches for the product on the field. We are all aware of CNS's recruiting prowess, but that is only one part of the equation. Most every poster likes to say that we are so talented that there is no way we can lose a game. I don't have all the vitals, but I would speculate we had more talent (as measured by recruiting sites) than Clemson, Auburn, LSU, USCe, TAMU and certainly Ole Miss when they beat us. We are where we are because of coaches developing players, facilities second to none, administration support, and yes an abundance of talent. LSU has all the above but a coaching staff than can develop its players. As for the Troy game, they were simply not prepared to play and that is on Orgeron.
 
Last edited:

Latest threads