We are a QB-running team without a true QB option offense, falling between two chairs...
I just don't understand the transition we have made or are making from a philosophy standpoint. I saw this coming last year when we made this decision to start a DT QB. Last year it was probably our best option with the win now philosophy which I think is a good philosophy for our program. You owe it all the other players even more so when they are elite players.
Obviously after the 2013 loss to Auburn to a degree how hard it was to defend Cam, Tebow, Manziel, and Watson, coach considered that he had to make a change to help his defense somehow get more experienced playing this style.
But the only team that has consistently been in the NC hunt every year for the last decade has been us running a prostyle offense. No other team has had the same consistency because they have to recruit and develop a QB to revolve their entire offense around. Miss on the recruit = no offense.
I just don't understand the transition. Under this approach, we have to recruit a 5* DT QB every other year at least and fill out offense with 3*-4* WRs and RBs. I get the prostyle QB recruits are probably harder to find nowadays but it still the player the NFL covets. I really hope someone writes a book on this transition someday to explain it to me because I just didn't see the need going down this road.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk