Here is some info from a column written last year by an epidemiologist I follow:
![]()
Argentina's vax rate surprises me. They have a very good healthcare system, really good Drs.
Here is some info from a column written last year by an epidemiologist I follow:
![]()
Let him focus on other more pressing health concerns and leave MMR alone.Deaths in America from 1999 to 2025
Suicide: 1,100,000
Overdose: 1,500,000
Heart attack: 17,800,000
Measles: 4
I can't speak for RFK but it seems he's more focused on the general public's overall health (obesity, chemicals/poisons in the food supply etc), which is - by far - the greater killer.
Again, I'm pro-MMR, etc. but in the decade before the measles vaccine was introduced the US averaged 400-500 deaths per year per the CDC. I expect focusing on the bigger issues facing our health is where the bigger payoff will be. I'd love it if he were pro-vaccines (specifically the long-proven vaxs) but the reality is you can save a LOT more lives by cleaning up the food supply.
Do both and it's a homerun.
School lunches could be another thread entirely, but as a teacher who has been in schools more years of my life than not, the Michelle Obama regulations did more to make food worse than make it better. The portions are not enough, there is no seasoning, and having everything baked makes it disgusting. The processed meat patties  that meet regulations  barely resemble meat. Vegetables straight out of the can don’t get chosen and the fresh fruit goes straight in the garbage. We need to go back to the school lunches of the 90s and earlier so that the kids that are really hungry will actually get the food and eat it.
Literally could not agree more.Let him focus on other more pressing health concerns and leave MMR alone.
If it ain't broke, dont fix it.
I agree, but that wasn’t why conservatives hated the program. They didn’t like the idea that Michelle Obama was telling kids what to eat.I work in the accounting/finance division of federal and state education, and it costs districts MILLIONS on top of MILLIONS of dollars in waste. The lunches sucked so bad the cafeterias were literally filling dumpsters full of untouched food.
I agree, but that wasn’t why conservatives hated the program. They didn’t like the idea that Michelle Obama was telling kids what to eat.
Back in the 90s and before, food was actually prepared on site. I remember working at a school where the hot dog and hamburger buns were freshly baked. Now, most meals are simply reheated (or cans are opened). There is very little in the way of fresh fruits and vegetables (other than the occasional apple), meat is processed, and everything is pretty bland. Kids still eat pizza and will visit the salad bar if there is one.
We need to serve a balanced diet of nutritious food that actually tastes good to students. And it should be at a price that all students can afford.
Yep. Good intentions, but poor execution. Things do need to change, but as long as school systems contract out the food service with strict standards, students are going to get the cheapest possible menu. The company providing the food (and the school board that hired them) doesn’t really care if kids eat it as long as the contract is fulfilled  as cheaply as possible for the school system and with as much profit as possible for the business.Agreed, but at the end of the day it was just a bad decision, regardless.
I thought school food was bad long before Michelle Obama came along.
Are you kidding me??? The yeast rolls were the absolute best thing on the lunchroom menu. When I was in high school, before I was 16 and could get a job, I would take the lunch menu my mom gave me and I would get three of the yeast rolls (they were huge) and pocket the rest of the money.It was a long time after elementary school that the smell of yeast rolls baking didn't instill dread and nausea in me.
You're being a little too cynical. My wife volunteered at the high school my boys went to and she spent a couple of years on the food committee. Our school system did really care about the kids and the "cost" of the food, while important, was not the primary motivating factor to who got the contract. They were looking for 1) a solid company that could do the work, 2) provide somewhat healthy food and 3) do it at a fair price.Yep. Good intentions, but poor execution. Things do need to change, but as long as school systems contract out the food service with strict standards, students are going to get the cheapest possible menu. The company providing the food (and the school board that hired them) doesn’t really care if kids eat it as long as the contract is fulfilled  as cheaply as possible for the school system and with as much profit as possible for the business.
Yep. Good intentions, but poor execution. Things do need to change, but as long as school systems contract out the food service with strict standards, students are going to get the cheapest possible menu. The company providing the food (and the school board that hired them) doesn’t really care if kids eat it as long as the contract is fulfilled  as cheaply as possible for the school system and with as much profit as possible for the business.
That’s good to hear. I admit that my information is mostly anecdotal, so I’m glad that my negative experiences aren’t the norm everywhere.You're being a little too cynical. My wife volunteered at the high school my boys went to and she spent a couple of years on the food committee. Our school system did really care about the kids and the "cost" of the food, while important, was not the primary motivating factor to who got the contract. They were looking for 1) a solid company that could do the work, 2) provide somewhat healthy food and 3) do it at a fair price.
Ewww! Just a personal reaction here but I hated our school lunches! I would have loved fresh fruit and fresh veggies but I went to public school from 1961 to 1973 and---gross. I was spoiled by Mama's cooking. Some people liked the lunches and I do not know why.School lunches could be another thread entirely, but as a teacher who has been in schools more years of my life than not, the Michelle Obama regulations did more to make food worse than make it better. The portions are not enough, there is no seasoning, and having everything baked makes it disgusting. The processed meat patties  that meet regulations  barely resemble meat. Vegetables straight out of the can don’t get chosen and the fresh fruit goes straight in the garbage. We need to go back to the school lunches of the 90s and earlier so that the kids that are really hungry will actually get the food and eat it.
They are attacking the science industry without engaging in the discussion of what science they want investigated over what has already been approved and funded. A MUCH better way is to let the current science grants and studies play out, then put up funding for what they would rather study. The researchers will follow with grant proposals and then they will get the studies (good or bad) on what they want to study. Just banning studies and words is dumb.
My kid's last elementary breakfasts were cooked by a friend/chef, who made souffles and the like in the morning for the kids. I know some kids ate two breakfasts because they loved his souffles so much. I don't know the details on the lunches as my picky kid always took their lunch in, but I doubt the food was as bland as your experience. I ate at the school several times for thanksgiving and the like, and the food was decent enough if you weren't a super picky eater.Ewww! Just a personal reaction here but I hated our school lunches! I would have loved fresh fruit and fresh veggies but I went to public school from 1961 to 1973 and---gross. I was spoiled by Mama's cooking. Some people liked the lunches and I do not know why.