The ruling is out and we will know momentarily if SCOTUS will remove a fundamental right to access medical care.
cue the gaslightingRoberts joined judgment, but not the opinion.
I am certain that originalists will decry the judicial activism from the right.cue the gaslighting
nah, the originalists got it right. the issue that women are really worried about is how much it cost to have dinner ready when their husbands get home from workI am certain that originalists will decry the judicial activism from the right.
Clarence Thomas writes, in a concurring opinion, that the Supreme Court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell — the rulings that now protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.
I was told I was being hyperbolic when I said the unenumerated right to privacy was threatened.
it's ok if it only applies to women, lgbtq+, minorities. apparently, it's what the lord wantsI was told I was being hyperbolic when I said the unenumerated right to privacy was threatened.
The dissent spells it out.it's ok if it only applies to women, lgbtq+, minorities. apparently, it's what the lord wants
they keep telling/showing us exactly what they are planning to do. and yet so many people still bend over backwards to give them the benefit of the doubt and make excuses for them while pretending to be above it all
I am sure Susan Collins still thinks they will not do thisthey keep telling/showing us exactly what they are planning to do. and yet so many people still bend over backwards to give them the benefit of the doubt and make excuses for them while pretending to be above it all
She's obviously very concerned.I am sure Susan Collins still thinks they will not do this
he will get one of the available for a limited time only "some of my best friends are black" pass.I wait with bated breath Judge Thomas' dissent when this "Court" , 5-4, rules against "Loving" and "Ollies BBQ". We still have laws against miscegenation on the books in many states and I'll bet Virginia is one. Which will be first, he being turned away from his favorite restaurant or imprisoned/lynched? Can I get odds?
No those are different because something something substantive due process reasons.I wait with bated breath Judge Thomas' dissent when this "Court" , 5-4, rules against "Loving" and "Ollies BBQ". We still have laws against miscegenation on the books in many states and I'll bet Virginia is one. Which will be first, he being turned away from his favorite restaurant or imprisoned/lynched? Can I get odds?
Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.