In my infinite knowledge of football and high level of coaching experience I have come to some conclusions about what the program should do moving forward as it relates to the defense, and would like to hear others thoughts when it comes to scheme and types of athletes needed to combat the overwhelming assault modern offenses are dishing out.
Seriously though it's a question alot of teams are asking, and I'm fascinated by it. Michigan moved the ball well against the vaunted OSU defense. A couple of turnovers really killed the momentum and put UM behind the 8 ball. LSU looks awful against competent offenses this year as well. Clemson has played no one at all so let's leave them out for now. UGA have looked relatively good, but how will they look after next weekend? My guess is not good. This is a total systemic meltdown on the defensive side of the ball across all of college football. What can be done?
Many have wondered here if CNS's 3/4 is dead in the water. I wouldn't go that far, but to be honest Some of the things we are seeing all over college football now were done as a direct attack against CNS's scheme. Ole Miss, Auburn, and A&M all brought in new schemes to attack Bama, and it worked. Look at the years with Johnny Foosball, Gus's sandlot crap, and Rev. Freeze's scheme. All of them attacked Bama, and this type of offense has spread out from the Big 12, Group of 5 schools, and the three mentioned above. LSU threw out their entire playbook so they could beat one team, Bama. CNS has changed offensive philosophy, but the defense hasn't changed scheme much. He did change types of players he was recruiting at certain positions. So the question is what to change?
I only see two options. One is keep the current basic scheme, but you have to have certain things to make it work. You must have a DL that can control the game. You need guys like Payne, Big Q, and Jonathan Allen. It also helps to have some edge speed guys to throw in at DE on passing downs. These are the Lewis, Williams, and Ryan Anderson's of the world. You need quality depth on the DL behind this. The point is to push the pocket from the middle.
Get straight in the QB's face. That's the best way to affect a QB. I don't think the edge rush gets it done because that QB is no longer a stationary target. The mobile QB can easily avoid the outside rush in way too many situations. Space eaters aren't enough. These guys have to get after the QB and get to him with no help from regular blitzes, and still be able to hold up against the run. The ILB's have to be fast side line to sideline guys. They have to be able to cover and react with speed to the RPO, the Rueben Foster and Rashan Evans types. The Back end of the defense doesn't have to change. This the only way to make the 3/4 work, and even then you will get gashed against elite QB's simply because of the rules. Specifically the 3 yard rule for lineman that makes it impossible for a LB and Safety to be able to read the play until several seconds have gone by. Watch any game and you will see OL wandering around 4-5 yards downfield and the QB still has the ball. It's awful. The problem with all of this is that UGA, LSU, UF, the Barn, and soon UTe all recruit at a high level. Clemson has been the real killer for Bama in my opinion. It was just one more team to have to fight with over recruits.
The other option will be tested soon in my opinion, and that is a hybrid defense. Clemson has run this well this year, but they are playing against mediocre high school teams. They are running different schemes constantly. I watched them against one team this year line up a guy at LB on one play, and the next play he was at Safety. It was wild. It was almost like they had 4 Mark Barron type players. They could go anywhere and do anything. They would cover the slot, blitz, and then play safety on the next play. It was so confusing to the already struggling OL that the QB was a dead man walking at the snap. Blitzes and coverage were constantly changing. You never knew where the next guy was coming from. It was less about beating the man in front of and more about creating chaos and indecision on the part of the OL and QB. One play the defense is lining up as a 3-2-6, then a 3-3-5, then a 2-4-5, and a then 4-2-5. Guys were subbing, but it was done more with these hybrid Safety/LB type guys. It was really interesting to watch. I will watch Clemson in the playoffs because I want to see if they try this against OK, OSU, or LSU. That will be a real test. It would bring a different way of attacking the offense to the table. Bama is predictable on defense in my opinion. Pruitt did the best job being unpredictable, but he did have a crazy level of talent in the front 7 that allowed him to get real creative and even he was knocked around at times.
The bottom line is either recruit and develop players at a crazy high level with the current scheme, or get creative. Stop reacting to the offense and start dictating to them by attacking them with schemes that change from game to game and even play to play. Make reading what you are doing presnap impossible by constantly changing how you are attacking. These modern offenses are often determining where to throw the ball before the ball is ever snapped. Take that away by not letting them know what you are doing presnap through formations and hybrid players that can be used anywhere on the field but interior DL. Not sure how this will hold up against a team that can pound the run, but the playoffs may tell us if Clemson pulls this out again.
Seriously though it's a question alot of teams are asking, and I'm fascinated by it. Michigan moved the ball well against the vaunted OSU defense. A couple of turnovers really killed the momentum and put UM behind the 8 ball. LSU looks awful against competent offenses this year as well. Clemson has played no one at all so let's leave them out for now. UGA have looked relatively good, but how will they look after next weekend? My guess is not good. This is a total systemic meltdown on the defensive side of the ball across all of college football. What can be done?
Many have wondered here if CNS's 3/4 is dead in the water. I wouldn't go that far, but to be honest Some of the things we are seeing all over college football now were done as a direct attack against CNS's scheme. Ole Miss, Auburn, and A&M all brought in new schemes to attack Bama, and it worked. Look at the years with Johnny Foosball, Gus's sandlot crap, and Rev. Freeze's scheme. All of them attacked Bama, and this type of offense has spread out from the Big 12, Group of 5 schools, and the three mentioned above. LSU threw out their entire playbook so they could beat one team, Bama. CNS has changed offensive philosophy, but the defense hasn't changed scheme much. He did change types of players he was recruiting at certain positions. So the question is what to change?
I only see two options. One is keep the current basic scheme, but you have to have certain things to make it work. You must have a DL that can control the game. You need guys like Payne, Big Q, and Jonathan Allen. It also helps to have some edge speed guys to throw in at DE on passing downs. These are the Lewis, Williams, and Ryan Anderson's of the world. You need quality depth on the DL behind this. The point is to push the pocket from the middle.
Get straight in the QB's face. That's the best way to affect a QB. I don't think the edge rush gets it done because that QB is no longer a stationary target. The mobile QB can easily avoid the outside rush in way too many situations. Space eaters aren't enough. These guys have to get after the QB and get to him with no help from regular blitzes, and still be able to hold up against the run. The ILB's have to be fast side line to sideline guys. They have to be able to cover and react with speed to the RPO, the Rueben Foster and Rashan Evans types. The Back end of the defense doesn't have to change. This the only way to make the 3/4 work, and even then you will get gashed against elite QB's simply because of the rules. Specifically the 3 yard rule for lineman that makes it impossible for a LB and Safety to be able to read the play until several seconds have gone by. Watch any game and you will see OL wandering around 4-5 yards downfield and the QB still has the ball. It's awful. The problem with all of this is that UGA, LSU, UF, the Barn, and soon UTe all recruit at a high level. Clemson has been the real killer for Bama in my opinion. It was just one more team to have to fight with over recruits.
The other option will be tested soon in my opinion, and that is a hybrid defense. Clemson has run this well this year, but they are playing against mediocre high school teams. They are running different schemes constantly. I watched them against one team this year line up a guy at LB on one play, and the next play he was at Safety. It was wild. It was almost like they had 4 Mark Barron type players. They could go anywhere and do anything. They would cover the slot, blitz, and then play safety on the next play. It was so confusing to the already struggling OL that the QB was a dead man walking at the snap. Blitzes and coverage were constantly changing. You never knew where the next guy was coming from. It was less about beating the man in front of and more about creating chaos and indecision on the part of the OL and QB. One play the defense is lining up as a 3-2-6, then a 3-3-5, then a 2-4-5, and a then 4-2-5. Guys were subbing, but it was done more with these hybrid Safety/LB type guys. It was really interesting to watch. I will watch Clemson in the playoffs because I want to see if they try this against OK, OSU, or LSU. That will be a real test. It would bring a different way of attacking the offense to the table. Bama is predictable on defense in my opinion. Pruitt did the best job being unpredictable, but he did have a crazy level of talent in the front 7 that allowed him to get real creative and even he was knocked around at times.
The bottom line is either recruit and develop players at a crazy high level with the current scheme, or get creative. Stop reacting to the offense and start dictating to them by attacking them with schemes that change from game to game and even play to play. Make reading what you are doing presnap impossible by constantly changing how you are attacking. These modern offenses are often determining where to throw the ball before the ball is ever snapped. Take that away by not letting them know what you are doing presnap through formations and hybrid players that can be used anywhere on the field but interior DL. Not sure how this will hold up against a team that can pound the run, but the playoffs may tell us if Clemson pulls this out again.