When UGA reviews the film from last night's game, they're going to be kicking themselves when they see how little they used #1 late in the game. Of all their RB's, he was THE beast. At the start of the 4th Quarter with UGA up by 10, Michel ripped off runs of 10, 5, and 13 yards... and by the way he was running it looked like he was getting into "the zone" dominant RB's sometimes find late in games. Yet, for some inexplicable reason, UGA replaced him with Chubb on that drive... and he didn't see substantial PT the rest of the game.
IMO, this is because of loyalty and a loaded RB roster. UGA has been forced to split time with 27, 1, and 7 all season long - and in THIS game I believe it came back to haunt them. If #1 had continued to stay in the game and play at the level he was showing on that drive, I think they score another TD and our job to come back becomes more difficult. In reality, I think this is something that has haunted us this year - there's just not enough PT/carries to go around when you have 3 RB's unless one of them is strictly a 3rd down player. The issue is that when a RB gets into a groove, you can't "ride him" in that scenario. I hope, going into next season, that we revert back to featuring 2 RB's rather than 3.
IMO, this is because of loyalty and a loaded RB roster. UGA has been forced to split time with 27, 1, and 7 all season long - and in THIS game I believe it came back to haunt them. If #1 had continued to stay in the game and play at the level he was showing on that drive, I think they score another TD and our job to come back becomes more difficult. In reality, I think this is something that has haunted us this year - there's just not enough PT/carries to go around when you have 3 RB's unless one of them is strictly a 3rd down player. The issue is that when a RB gets into a groove, you can't "ride him" in that scenario. I hope, going into next season, that we revert back to featuring 2 RB's rather than 3.