LOL - so Zimmerman is the victim."Right to kill" is mighty subjective when you're being attacked.
LOL - so Zimmerman is the victim."Right to kill" is mighty subjective when you're being attacked.
He was chasing him in the dark, in the rain. He didn't ask him anything.So following someone and asking questions is provocation to fight?
he pursued the kid and shot him. that is not being attacked."Right to kill" is mighty subjective when you're being attacked.
Does anybody have any info on how many shots were actually fired, and how many times the kid was shot? Supposedly, there was a "warning shot" followed by an interval of some time (some say 30 seconds, don't think it was that long) and then another shot; screams were supposedly heard in the interval between shots.It may not matter to you, but it has everything to do with whether the killing was self defense. Zimmerman has no obligation to refrain from following people and asking them questions, regardless of what someone at 911 says.
Lisbeth Salander would have kicked his arse.Kick a hornet's nest, then complain that you got stung - watch people laugh at you. In this case, he kicked a hornet's nest, got stung, then pulled out a flame thrower to get even.In the process, he burned down his entire house.
I can't speak to that.And, correct me if I'm wrong, riz...but isn't Sanford kinda like Beulah, in certain respects?
Do you think Zimmerman roughed himself up?LOL - so Zimmerman is the victim.
The evidence contradicts you.He was chasing him in the dark, in the rain. He didn't ask him anything.
Black is a descriptor. Especially in regards to crime. You don't hear too many police calls referring to a "6ft man in jeans" because that isn't very helpful. You look for a "6ft caucasian man in jeans". If you are calling in a suspicious person, you list their ethnicity when describing them to police. Now did this guy get suspicious because he saw a black kid walking around with the hood pulled up on his hoodie? Probably. But I'm pretty sure he didn't decide to chase down and shoot the kid because he was black.I added in the things that we DO know. Namely, that he identified the boy as black when he called the police, and that he refused to comply with the police when they told him to back off. So, to him, race was important, and his decision to continue the "pursuit" when told to back off led to the death of an innocent boy. IMO, you have to stretch to come to a different conclusion.
He said "these a-holes always get away". I'm not sure what "coon" is supposed to refer to in regards to a black person anyways.Have you listened to the 911 call? He calls him a "curse word"ing coon when he started chasing him. He said, these xxxxxxx coons always get away. I am not looking for it - it is right there.
Back in the mid-90's I worked with a guy from there (Sanford), and that was the impression I got...but I can't honestly remember if he actually said something, or if I just got the feeling from the way he was.I can't speak to that.
That means the kid was a Cajun, I think.I'm not sure what "coon" is supposed to refer to in regards to a black person anyways.
Old racist derogatory term, used mostly in the South, I think.Black is a descriptor. Especially in regards to crime. You don't hear too many police calls referring to a "6ft man in jeans" because that isn't very helpful. You look for a "6ft caucasian man in jeans". If you are calling in a suspicious person, you list their ethnicity when describing them to police. Now did this guy get suspicious because he saw a black kid walking around with the hood pulled up on his hoodie? Probably. But I'm pretty sure he didn't decide to chase down and shoot the kid because he was black.
He said "these a-holes always get away". I'm not sure what "coon" is supposed to refer to in regards to a black person anyways.
ABC News was there exclusively as the 16-year-old girl told Crump about the last moments of the teenager's life. Martin had been talking to his girlfriend all the way to the store where he bought Skittles and a tea. The phone was in his pocket and the earphone in his ear, Crump said.
"He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man," Martin's friend said. "I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run, but he said he was not going to run."
Eventually, he would run, said the girl, thinking that he'd managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.
"Trayvon said, 'What are you following me for,' and the man said, 'What are you doing here.' Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. I called him again, and he didn't answer the phone."
The line went dead. Besides screams heard on 911 calls that night as Martin and Zimmerman scuffled, those were the last words he said.
Trayvon's phone logs, also obtained exclusively by ABC News, show the conversation occurred five minutes before police first arrived on the scene. Crump said the girl's identity was being withheld because "her parents are gravely concerned about her health and her safety." Her parents asked that only an attorney be allowed to ask her questions.
Martin's father, Tracey Martin, and mother, Sybrina Fulton, listened to the call, along with ABC News, ashen-faced.
"He knew he was being followed and tried to get away from the guy, and the guy still caught up with him," Tracey Martin said. "And that's the most disturbing part. He thought he had got away from the guy, and the guy backtracked for him."
The girl was so distraught after the killing that she spent a night in the hospital, the lawyer said.
he pursued the kid and shot him. that is not being attacked.
So Zimmerman did ask what he was doing there. And instead of a conversation, there was a physical altercation, and we have only the word of the survivor as to how it started. And a lot of assumptions.
and a dead kid who was doing nothing but walking home from the storeSo Zimmerman did ask what he was doing there. And instead of a conversation, there was a physical altercation, and we have only the word of the survivor as to how it started. And a lot of assumptions.
No, we also have the testimony of the girl, which contradicts Zimmerman's in a few key areas. That alone tells us that Zimmerman has lied to cover his tracks. But he has you covering his tracks for him, so he should be fine. :wink:So Zimmerman did ask what he was doing there. And instead of a conversation, there was a physical altercation, and we have only the word of the survivor as to how it started. And a lot of assumptions.
She's no more objective/reliable as a witness in this matter than Zimmerman.No, we also have the testimony of the girl, which contradicts Zimmerman's in a few key areas. That alone tells us that Zimmerman has lied to cover his tracks. But he has you covering his tracks for him, so he should be fine. :wink:
The phone records confirm her version of the story.She's no more objective/reliable as a witness in this matter than Zimmerman.
Phone records confirm what, exactly? That they were on the phone before the time of death? Phone records aren't going to show how the fight occurred.The phone records confirm her version of the story.
I believe it was "Old Sparky" in Florida.Bring back yellow mama.
![]()