Game Thread: Virginia Tech vs Tennessee

[ValuJet]

heh! :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

 

[crimsonaudio]

WOW - HUGE review!

A FG here is YUGE!

 

[crimsonaudio]

YES!

VT up 17-14 @ half.

 

[RJ YellowHammer]

17-14 Hokie, Hokie, Hokie, High!
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Tide1986]

Consistent officiating...same call as the Texas/Nebraska game...good call to add time back on the clock...of course, I'm rooting for the Hokies.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Get 15]

Great play VT!:BigA:

 

[Tidewater]

You don't see that cuts on 360.

Dangit, TD UT - 14-14.

Tyrod, be a little more careful with the ball late in the half. Tyrod was able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by throwing a stupid pick.
At least if UT pulls this out, at least I won't have to listen to Hokie fans talk about how they beat a great SEC team.

 

[bat123]

2 cool...............

 

[Craxycat]

LOL Lane must not have watched the TX game. This has been a heck of a gameday with OK/Stanford and this game..

Edited to ask: My hubby and I were talking about it while they were getting set up after time was put back on the clock. What if TN didn't come back out..does the D even have to be on the feild? If VT set their players up on the line (I know the D doesn't have to be set) would TN get a penalty or could VT just run it in without a D on the LOS? Hilarity insues at TN if that could/would have happened.

 

[Tide1986]

LOL Lane must not have watched the TX game. This has been a heck of a game day with OK/Stanford and this game.

True...good games...I, however, wasted my time watching the Nebraska/Arizona game...what an awful game.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Craxycat]

True...good games...I, however, wasted my time watching the Nebraska/Arizona game...what an awful game.
Posted via Mobile Device

It was so bad I forgot about it when I was posting about the two really good games.

 

[crimsonaudio]

What if TN didn't come back out..does the D even have to be on the feild? If VT set their players up on the line (I know the D doesn't have to be set) would TN get a penalty or could VT just run it in without a D on the LOS?

No rule on a minimum number of defensive players - VT would have had an easy 8 points.

 

[bamabelle1991]

IIRC, he's the one who committed to LSU but switched on NSD (without telling the LSU staff he had changed his mind). And yah, he's been arrested for armed robbery (charges dropped) and supposedly in trouble for smoking weed.

Seems like a quality guy.

Ah, yes. Thanks for the info!

 

[IMALOYAL1]

I hope UT looses by a FG. I want to hear Lane cry about the officiating. :tongue:

 

[Craxycat]

No rule on a minimum number of defensive players - VT would have had an easy 8 points.

Dang it...THAT would have made Kiffin go Chernobyl! *sigh* It's a really good picture in my head, and the multiple scenarios (what could have happened) just keep on popping into my head.

 

[BamaCorvin]

V Tech about to punch it in!!!!

 

[crimsonaudio]

V Tech about to punch it in!!!!

Yah, Williams is gashing them nicely.

 

[crimsonaudio]

TD VT!

VT up 24-14.

 

[BamaCorvin]

TD Taylor!!! Stinks Williams didn't get the TD.

 

[Craxycat]

Good Play calling on that drive. Bam! Holy shifty speed batman!

VT seems to be coming together now.