If you could con

I doubt that Ryans would leave the NFL for college football, but if he was willing to do so -Amen to that, brother.
Hiring a coach always has a big element of crapshoot involved.
During our walk in the wilderness between Bryant and Saban (Stallings oasis of 1991-94 acknowledged), we had bad fortune with experienced HCs (Perkins, Franchione and Price), bad fortune with inexperienced HCs (Dubose and Shula), and a bad cultural fit with Curry.
Hard to believe now, but even Saban wasn't a sure thing in January of 2007. He had a reputation of alienating assistants and leaving jobs after short stints.
This is another reason why I think you need to be really sure you can hire an upgrade if you fire a coach. The simple emotion of, "Fahr heeuz sorry carcass!" isn't productive. The list of programs who have done that to their own detriment, often not long after signing the recently-fired coach to a highly lucrative long-term contract, is long.
aTm is just the most recent example. There but for personal misconduct goes Michigan State for a similar buyout number. Auburn is the poster child with Bowden, Tuberville, Chizik, Malzahn and Harsin all collecting huge buyouts (Malzahn's was a record until aTm and Jimbo).
At 7-4 and headed into a much tougher league, how does USCw feel about hiring the play-pretty of the day in Lincoln Riley?
The list goes on.
When that sad day comes and we have to replace Saban, assuming I could hand-pick literally anybody, I'd want Kirby or Ryan Day. I might even make them tell me no before going on to others. But there's no realistic expectation that either of them will leave where they are.
So my personal short list among those who might actually come (in no particular order) is Dan Lanning, DeMeco Ryans and Mike Norvell. And yes I know that each of them has his own set of, "yeah, but....." questions.
Agree or disagree with those names. But if you disagree, name someone else who would realistically come and would be better.
