That's a surprising read...I'm guessing she made passing reference to this feeling during the course of an interview, the writer realized that would best stir the pot, and highlighted that remark over anything else said, even returning to it to mention it twice in the same article.
That's my impression of how the Wall Street Journal generally covers things.
But even so, for her to feel this way is hard to understand...if she wanted a collection of freshly amputated fingers I bet they would pour in. It looks like any empty seats in the stands at all might be a sign of under appreciation. When a game doesn't sell out, should an alum group buy what's left and give the tickets to deserving people on the promise they watch the full game?
It would be nice if there was a way for the fans to satisfactorily express proper appreciation, and be part of the reason they would want to stay. The writer slanted that story to suggest they were going to stay in spite of being unappreciated.
This ought to be simple to resolve with everybody happy. (With fingers crossed, hoping for the best.)
That's my impression of how the Wall Street Journal generally covers things.
But even so, for her to feel this way is hard to understand...if she wanted a collection of freshly amputated fingers I bet they would pour in. It looks like any empty seats in the stands at all might be a sign of under appreciation. When a game doesn't sell out, should an alum group buy what's left and give the tickets to deserving people on the promise they watch the full game?
It would be nice if there was a way for the fans to satisfactorily express proper appreciation, and be part of the reason they would want to stay. The writer slanted that story to suggest they were going to stay in spite of being unappreciated.
This ought to be simple to resolve with everybody happy. (With fingers crossed, hoping for the best.)