2016 Election - Clinton: The Hillary Clinton Thread

White privilege??? Is she really this stupid or pandering for votes? I am a white male who has put two kids through college (UA) on MY dime. No loans, no handouts, nothing. I travel every year over 100,000 air miles and spend 75-100 nights yearly on the road to support my family. Yep, that's my white privilege. SMH, what an idiot!

She's pandering. Plain and simple.
 
Hillary says whites need to do a better job of recognizing their "privilege." Oh brother. What? That I work two jobs to support my family? That's my privilege? Nice.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...ricans-need-better-job-recognizing-privilege/

Chelsea Clinton steps out of college and her mom gets her a job paying $900,000 a year for doing next to nothing. Next, Hillary got paid $250,000 for 20 minute speeches in front of bankers and Wall Street investors.. Now she travels around the country making even more speeches denigrating ''white privilege''.
What's wrong with this picture?

Or does the one drop rule apply here?
 
Last edited:
Dear God....make it stop.

NncEftF.jpg
 
Dear God....make it stop.

NncEftF.jpg

Someone mentioned the debil (i.e. Devil/Satan/Lucifer) in another thread. Is this what the debil looks like? If not, it's the debil's OLDest daughter or was that Jezebel? I will go to my grave thinking that this is what the debil looks like or at least Jezebel!

Well, this is what EVIL looks like!
 
Last edited:
Someone mentioned the debil (i.e. Devil/Satan/Lucifer) in another thread. Is this what the debil looks like? If not, it's the debil's OLDest daughter or was that Jezebel? I will go to my grave thinking that this is what the debil looks like or at least Jezebel!

Well, this is what EVIL looks like!
Everyone has always assumed that when Satan next appears, it will be in the form of a man. Now I'm not so sure.
Well this seems like a good starting point for productive discourse.

In other news, a Trump advisor is now being investigated by the secret service for saying that Hillary is a traitor and should be shot by a firing squad. And then sleeping on his comments, deciding they were appropriate, and defending them the very next day. But I'm sure violent and dehumanizing rhetoric from the GOP is totally overblown by the lamestream media.
 
Well this seems like a good starting point for productive discourse.

In other news, a Trump advisor is now being investigated by the secret service for saying that Hillary is a traitor and should be shot by a firing squad. And then sleeping on his comments, deciding they were appropriate, and defending them the very next day. But I'm sure violent and dehumanizing rhetoric from the GOP is totally overblown by the lamestream media.


Yeah, there surely couldn't be anything questionable on the Dem side, like some nutty Hillary delegate shooting her husband in the neck...
 
Well this seems like a good starting point for productive discourse.

In other news, a Trump advisor is now being investigated by the secret service for saying that Hillary is a traitor and should be shot by a firing squad. And then sleeping on his comments, deciding they were appropriate, and defending them the very next day. But I'm sure violent and dehumanizing rhetoric from the GOP is totally overblown by the lamestream media.

Based on the fact that she knowingly exposed national security interests through her email on her illegal server he was and is right. She is a traitor and the penalty he suggested is what the law demands.

Before you say I am proving you right understand I am, as of yesterday, no longer a Republican. Just like the shooters who murdered police, I am saying I am not associated with any political organization and am not basing my opinions on any of their rhetoric.
 
Based on the fact that she knowingly exposed national security interests through her email on her illegal server he was and is right. She is a traitor and the penalty he suggested is what the law demands.

Before you say I am proving you right understand I am, as of yesterday, no longer a Republican. Just like the shooters who murdered police, I am saying I am not associated with any political organization and am not basing my opinions on any of their rhetoric.


I am no Clinton apologist by any stretch of the imagination, but I seriously doubt that her email fiasco would meet a definition of treason...failure to properly protect classified information, maybe, but not treason...
 
Well this seems like a good starting point for productive discourse.

In other news, a Trump advisor is now being investigated by the secret service for saying that Hillary is a traitor and should be shot by a firing squad. And then sleeping on his comments, deciding they were appropriate, and defending them the very next day. But I'm sure violent and dehumanizing rhetoric from the GOP is totally overblown by the lamestream media.

At least it's just rhetoric, Dems are reality

iu
 
Based on the fact that she knowingly exposed national security interests through her email on her illegal server he was and is right. She is a traitor and the penalty he suggested is what the law demands.
How absurd.

After something like 8 investigations, including one by an admittedly partisan GOP-led committee and another by the FBI, it was each time found time that nothing criminal occurred. Mistakes were made, sure, but no criminal wrongdoing and certainly nothing even distantly resembling treason. Calling for her execution is an escalation of rhetoric that should shame any decent American.
 
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads