Is this in HD and do they charge you for extra boxes like cable does?
Is this in HD and do they charge you for extra boxes like cable does?
Is this in HD and do they charge you for extra boxes like cable does?
I'm not positive but I think you are right. You could also probably cast it to your tv if you have a chromecast or just use an HDMI cord to a laptop.I could be wrong about this (and if I am will someone please correct me) but I think if you have a smart tv then there is no need for the HULU box, but you will need to purchase the box if you do not have a smart tv.... Like I said, if I am wrong, please correct.
Do you get HD channels with sling?
Yes. I have it through a Roku, but it is only in 720p. But, I don't mind. I only pay $25 that includes the sports package that includes the SECN.
Yes. I have it through a Roku, but it is only in 720p. But, I don't mind. I only pay $25 that includes the sports package that includes the SECN.
720p is pretty good and it's what I usually get through Charter HD now, anyway.
Amazing, someone broke the dadgum code. Give the customer what he wants, without seventeen channels of Home Shopping Network.
I do the same as you. Sling from a Roku. We love it. We have pretty speedy wi-fi so that's not a concern and they keep working on the interface which makes it easier to navigate and it's even gotten snappier on their end. Load times have decreased massively. I've had it for the pas couple of years, since right around it's inception. $25 a month plus an HD antenna gets me all the sports I really want.Yes. I have it through a Roku, but it is only in 720p. But, I don't mind. I only pay $25 that includes the sports package that includes the SECN.
It's hard to say this without getting political, but I still think it's a valid point. Regardless of how you feel about the issue of paid maternity leave and so on, it's pretty hard to argue against the notion that a sure fire way to let your employer know they can do without you is to be gone for an extended period of time. Not that I'm trying to justify ESPN's actions mind you.Sportscenter Anchor Sara Walsh was getting ready to return from maternity leave (had twins). She tweeted this just now:
Did you really think they'd lay off the "right" people?whoever the girl was previewing the Celtics game on sportscenter just now should have been right at the top of the list for layoffs. especially over some of the others that got the boot. my goodness
I think he moved straight from there to Flint...He has aged well. I remember him on a local ABC affiliate in Columbus, Ga. during the '90s
It seems that they laid off expensive people, a lot of the beat reporters/writers, but danced around certain types that may cause a stir if fired en masse.
Look at what they did to the BCS and then the playoffs, cable only? Sure, it might be good for them in terms of revenue (forcing subscriptions) but it's terrible for the sport to limit the number of households that can see the game. The worst part of all that, is after they moved the BCSCG from broadcast to cable, ESPN starting running stories about lower ratings. How dishonest of them, the ratings drops aligned with the drop in the number of households that could get the game, but ESPN has an agenda there so...
It seems that they laid off expensive people, a lot of the beat reporters/writers, but danced around certain types that may cause a stir if fired en masse.
I think you may be right. It wouldn't be the first time. Rece told me, probably 16-18 years ago now, that ESPN was reaching down into mid-sized markets for younger people they could pay a lot less. He was 39 when ESPN hired him out of Flint, MI. Very hard for me to believe he's now 60...