The best programs do not always prevail. The point of competition is the best do not always win. If this were about the best programs the final four should be Alabama, Georgia, OSU, and FSU. If FSU is a swear word replace with Texas or Washington. I watched the Georgia<>Bama game. Bowers and McConkey were shadows of themselves. I think Georgia would do just fine in a rematch with both fully healed. FSU would be just fine with their 2nd string QB throwing jump balls to Coleman. OSU would have beaten Georgia last year if Harrison Jr was not knocked of the game. OSU just happened to play team a completely calibrated for beating them this year. OSU has significantly more football talent than Michigan. The first Michigan pick in the 2024 draft might be in the bottom of the 2nd round. Regardless of the results on the field, OSU is the better program and better suited for winning a playoff game in a sunny clime or in a domed stadium. I would argue of all the teams OSU is built best to win a college playoff game. With a month to prepare, these games shootouts. OSU is the team that can win a game 50 to 40. Marvin Harrison Jr is deity among ants. Which where the NFL has the leg up on college football. No TV executive could tell Nick Foles, that the Eagles were being replaced in the playoffs with a more competitive team because he looked so bad the last two games of the regular season.
But I am getting off base. I don't mind if the best teams get in. I stated from the beginning of this thread college football has never been about fair. I'm saying if we want college football to remain as is, the illusion of fair needs to remain even if we chortle that it is not. Keep going with things the way they are and college will become minor league NFL. Perhaps that is the product that you want. FSU is going to be least of the problems.
That's why I said, "This is not a rigged system, except in the sense that it leans in favor of merit, as it should, thus the best programs
usually prevail.". I didn't say
always prevail.
IMO, the NFL is no more likely to crown the best NFL team than college. Were the NYG better than NE in '08' or '12'? No, but they were the champs. There are other examples.
At least the CFPC evaluates the whole year and considers factors which the NFL does not, such as the fact that is some sports some inequities must be addressed such as dramtically varying SOSs (like 55 vs 5). Frankly, the best team is frequently not crowned in many mature US sports. Somebody gets hot, or conversely, teams get key injuries, or a break occurs and things start snowballing psychologically, etc. FSU was part of formulating the CFP rules, knew them going in and signed off on them. Their sense of disappointment is understandable and any rational person can sympathize, but they don't have a leg to stand on legally or morally.
Your "sympathy" with them, assuming you are sincere or don't consciously or subconsciously resent Alabama, is simply misguided in terms of the "dream" being lost. It's no different today than is was a month ago. Although I can't read your mind, IMO, you, and others, just don't like who benefitted this year. And your resentment is pretty strong because you keep spilling a lot of beans on the beneficiary's msg board, the most unlikely place you are to find sympathy. But I could be wrong, it may be that you have such high regard for the character and analytical abilities of the Alabama fan base, that you have come seeking their support for your egalitarian leanings.