The flow of the game, the way the offense operated, the turnovers at the absolute most CRITICAL times…how every time we got the ball back when it was a ONE SCORE game we COULD NOT take the lead…
…the offense was definitely PART of the problem and that includes LANK and his two turnovers and inability to lead a scoring drive when it was a ONE score game.
Again…
*Before the season*
“We know our defense is incredibly thin. Our offense will have to carry usâ€Â
I even remember one well-known poster on here proudly proclaiming how “vastly improved†Milroe was…
and I seen all these issues well before the Tennessee game and got absolutely hammered on here..
I was correct in my assessment, and it’s the same consistent message I have had all year. This defense is actually good enough to win games.
You have to not only score points in this day and age, but be efficient in the way you operate.
Don’t turn the ball over 2 or 3 times a game, go 3 and out half the possessions, but hit a few big plays and then proclaim “Milroe is VASTLY IMPROVED and the offense is NOT THE PROBLEM!
Yes it is. And it has been all year long.
Sorry, but your assessment regarding the Vanderbilt game is just wrong.
All your vague references to what some people said at some point before and during the season doesn't bolster your argument about the Vanderbilt game.
I get that in theory the offense could have tried to increase TOP by taking more time to score, but that's not how our offense operates (although I wish we had a ball control offense).
We were also playing from behind the entire game after the opening kickoff when Vanderbilt scored a TD on their first possession, and the defense couldn't get off the field for almost the entire game.
You can't let an opponent go 13/19 on third and fourth down and expect to win.
If the defense had been able to hold Vanderbilt to 50% conversion rate on third and fourth down (which is still horrendously bad defense) we likely would have won the game the way our offense was scoring.
When you let the other team convert nearly 70% of their third and fourth down conversions, leading to 42 minutes of possession, it's difficult for any offense to sufficiently complement the defense in such a way as to win a game.
The offense certainly wasn't perfect, but the defense is the reason we lost to Vanderbilt.
Flip to the Tennessee game...the defense played well enough for us to win that game, but the offense wasn't up to the task.
This team has played one half of truly complementary football against a serious opponent, and nearly blew it in the second half of that game. And it's all been downhill from there.