Yes that was always the argument, but that is not what this is.This is a really tough one.
On one hand we have been paying coaches hand over fist , while the players were not getting monetary compensation for their efforts. The schools and NCAA made a good amount of money off of the players. So the system changed due to lawsuits.
Players are able to sign autographs and do commercials etc. to make some money off their name. I'm ok with that. That is what NIL was set up for. Not to just give out piles of cash.
Athletes may not have been monetary compensated but they are compensated and farily well. They are getting an education, housing, food, clothes, they are paid when they do team functions and not in school. The money the school makes is reinvested in facilities, tutors, programs to be successful that the average student does not have access to. There can be an argument as to what is "fair" but they are compensated pretty good.
Universities are still not sharing their $$ which is why they have to ask us. That may change this summer when the revenue sharing is decided upon, but even if that happens that will just take away money from something already in the budget and they will need a fundraising campaign for what cannot be funded. They will still come to the fans. I do not fault the players or Byrne, they are just playing in the sandbox they have.
This is an insane sytem where the University begs fans for cash if they want to have a successful program. "If you don't give we can't compete with other programs." In Byrne's defense ( or Kelly or whoever is saying it) they are not wrong.
I choose not to participate. If that means Bama is not as competivie so be it, but I am not donating $$ to a system where a 2nd string SO CB can make demands on a school because he can get seven figures somewhere else. Then what happens after spring ball or after next season. Again I do not entirely blame the athletes, this is the system, but it is broken. If I have cash to donate to this I would rather donate to a worthy charity instead. Maybe to St. Jude to help kids that really need it.
These players need to have contracts just like the coaches. Don't perform and you can get fired. You want to change schools, there is a buyout attached. You (or the new school) pays compensation to the current school in order for you to leave. The argument has always been coaches leave whenever they want, so should the players. There is a buyout attached to the coaches. They leave, they owe a buyout. If atheltes want the same freedom, they should have to pay the same price.