Immigration and Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.) (part II)

But I do believe in free enterprise. For instance, I can house a few soldiers for a little while in exchange for letting me use that grenade launcher. It won't take but a second and my neighbor's noisy truck goes to that big scrapyard in the sky. Heck, I'll even promise to wait until he gets out of the truck first.

And if they let me borrow that rocket launcher for my neighbor who decides to crank up his gas-powered leaf blower at 6AM on Saturday morning.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CrimsonJazz
Oh for crying out loud.

You would say Pretti was looking for trouble, I would say Rittenhouse was looking for trouble.
Why can’t you just say they were both looking for trouble?
Rittenhouse brought a gun to a protest. Pretti brought a gun to a protest.
They were both stupid to do that. Beyond that, there is little to no equivalency between the two situations.

Rittenhouse was lucky that he took out the pervs who attacked him instead of being killed himself. But he was acting in self defense. As Bazza stated, his claimed purpose for being there was to deter vandalism of his relative’s property by the mob.

Pretti was trying to defend an illegal alien convict against the police carrying out a legal apprehension.
You can’t celebrate one and then turn around and say it was wrong for the other. That’s what Trump and his deranged supporters are now doing.
That’s what you’re doing. The same principle applies in reverse.

Having a gun was not illegal. Is anyone saying he was illegally carrying? The issue was obstructing a police action and then resisting when they tried to restrain him. Having a gun was “wrong” in the sense that it was stupid to bring a gun to a tussle with the police.
It’s not rocket science.
Apparently it is.
 
I think they issued the Proud (pardoned) Boys tac gear and set them loose...

Why can’t you just say they were both looking for trouble?

They were both stupid to do that. Beyond that, there is little to no equivalency between the two situations.

Rittenhouse was lucky that he took out the pervs who attacked him instead of being killed himself. But he was acting in self defense. As Bazza stated, his claimed purpose for being there was to deter vandalism of his relative’s property by the mob.

Pretti was trying to defend an illegal alien convict against the police carrying out a legal apprehension.

That’s what you’re doing. The same principle applies in reverse.

Having a gun was not illegal. Is anyone saying he was illegally carrying? The issue was obstructing a police action and then resisting when they tried to restrain him. Having a gun was “wrong” in the sense that it was stupid to bring a gun to a tussle with the police.

Apparently it is.

In other words: Don't tread on me, except when it's the commie libs. Shoot them.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 92tide
Pretti was trying to defend an illegal alien convict against the police carrying out a legal apprehension.

One of the main issues I've seen is when the news shows video of ICE arresting someone, whether it be a justified arrest or not, is there are too many citizens who are supposed to be there "peacefully" protesting, not "peacefully" protesting and getting involved with the arrest. They are running up to ICE officers, who are not engaging them and screaming in their faces, with their phones right beside their screams, videoing. They are helping create the environment that can cause things to go wrong. Does ICE need to be reeled in and held legally responsible for their actions? Yep. But that doesn't negate the responsibility citizens have to not break the law and not contribute to the chaos. I literally have watched video after video shown by ABC and CBS of protestors breaking the law and contributing to the chaos.

I can tell you if I were witnessing an arrest and I suddenly rushed at one of the arresting officers to start screaming in his face, there's a chance I may not make it all the way to him before I had bullets or a taser put to my chest, and it could be easily argued he would be justified in doing so. The person they're arresting may be getting wrongfully arrested. But it doesn't then dismiss me of all the law if I insert myself into the situation. The situation is already intense, without "me", a by-standard citizen, being involved. To have me rushing one of the officers involved just escalates the situation ten fold and raises the risk of something going bad wrong.

The entire thing has gotten out of hand.
 

ICE detain mother who went outside to warm up her car — leaving her kids behind in house alone.

"Please, my car kids are all alone in the house!" she calls out in Spanish."They've already taken me. Yes, that's why I'm calling — but please help me now with my kids. Please!"

The incident occurred today in a south-central residential area of Minneapolis, Minnesota.





Another dangerous criminal taken off the streets by the bravest of masked men.
 
  • Emphasis!
Reactions: UAH and 92tide

ICE detain mother who went outside to warm up her car — leaving her kids behind in house alone.

"Please, my car kids are all alone in the house!" she calls out in Spanish."They've already taken me. Yes, that's why I'm calling — but please help me now with my kids. Please!"

The incident occurred today in a south-central residential area of Minneapolis, Minnesota.





Another dangerous criminal taken off the streets by the bravest of masked men.
why do you hate enforcing immigration laws
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huckleberry
One of the main issues I've seen is when the news shows video of ICE arresting someone, whether it be a justified arrest or not, is there are too many citizens who are supposed to be there "peacefully" protesting, not "peacefully" protesting and getting involved with the arrest. They are running up to ICE officers, who are not engaging them and screaming in their faces, with their phones right beside their screams, videoing. They are helping create the environment that can cause things to go wrong. Does ICE need to be reeled in and held legally responsible for their actions? Yep. But that doesn't negate the responsibility citizens have to not break the law and not contribute to the chaos. I literally have watched video after video shown by ABC and CBS of protestors breaking the law and contributing to the chaos.

I can tell you if I were witnessing an arrest and I suddenly rushed at one of the arresting officers to start screaming in his face, there's a chance I may not make it all the way to him before I had bullets or a taser put to my chest, and it could be easily argued he would be justified in doing so. The person they're arresting may be getting wrongfully arrested. But it doesn't then dismiss me of all the law if I insert myself into the situation. The situation is already intense, without "me", a by-standard citizen, being involved. To have me rushing one of the officers involved just escalates the situation ten fold and raises the risk of something going bad wrong.

The entire thing has gotten out of hand.
Can you say "lawless?"
 
Source: ICE to begin using empty Melania theaters as temporary detention facilities.— NY Times Pitchbot (@nytpitchbot.bsky.social) January 29, 2026 at 2:03 PM
As an aside, I wonder what the marketing research said about the demand/enthusiasm for a film about Melania. I find it hard to believe that there was much evidence that it would be well-attended even in areas with high support for Trump.
 

Story about a guy from Blount County who got deported to Mexico after spending most of his life in this country. Left behind his fiancee and young son.

I felt bad for him until I read he was a Trump supporter. Tough nookies, enjoy life in Mexico.
You would feel bad for him, but you do not because he was a Trump supporter?
That level of hatred is an eloquent argument for a national divorce. It is also probably not good for your soul, either.

As for me, it would appear this young man had a couple of decades to take care of this problem (being inside the United States illegally, even if brought here as a minor child), but did not take care of it and one day, it bit him in the backside. Probably should have taken care of that before ICE showed up on his doorstep.
And this guy's voting behavior has little to do with that.
 
As an aside, I wonder what the marketing research said about the demand/enthusiasm for a film about Melania. I find it hard to believe that there was much evidence that it would be well-attended even in areas with high support for Trump.
my guess is that the market “research” that was presented showed that it would be a boffo box office success, the likes of which have never been seen before
 
  • Like
Reactions: UAH
This is how real LEOs behave. Drunk DHS agent finds out he is not above the law.


Drunk, with his kids in the car. These are the dumb people DHS is hiring.

He asks the cop if he is Haitian. He's drunk and concerned about the cop's nationality. Again, these are the idiots DHS is hiring.

He's concerned about his kids in the car while refusing to get in the police car. I bet he shows no concern for kids when he's at work and dragging their parents to unmarked cars.

How many times does he refuse to comply with the officer's commands? Interesting how these cops chose not to shoot him in the back for resisting. According to MAGA folks, resisting justifies deadly force these days, right?

Hopefully, this idiot gets fired.
 
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads