Toggle sidebar

2026 Recruiting

dtgreg said:
Basically, this'll force everybody to put walk-on depth on scholarship. With the amount of money schools are swimming in these days, I think it's great.
Click to expand...
But I suspect it'll only apply to the preferred walk one. I had a buddy in college who tried out for the team during walk on tryouts and made it. That type of walk-on is likely gone, and it's a shame. There's just not gonna be room for them anymore. I wonder if we still even hold tryouts.
 
Last edited:
dtgreg said:
Basically, this'll force everybody to put walk-on depth on scholarship. With the amount of money schools are swimming in these days, I think it's great.
Click to expand...

Revenues are up, but so are expenses.

Between coaching salaries (HCs and assistants in all sports, but especially football and basketball) and pay-for-play in all sports, and fired coaches’ buyouts, the truly profitable programs are few and far between.

Net net, top-line income isn’t profit, and very few schools end up in the black after payroll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TiderJack, dtgreg, Padreruf and 1 other person
4Q Basket Case said:
Revenues are up, but so are expenses.

Between coaching salaries (HCs and assistants in all sports, but especially football and basketball) and pay-for-play in all sports, and fired coaches’ buyouts, the truly profitable programs are few and far between.

Net net, top-line income isn’t profit, and very few schools end up in the black after payroll.
Click to expand...
I love the idea of a salary cap for players, collectively bargained. Now do the coaches. I seem to remember Coach Bryant couldn't make more than the school President...
 
dtgreg said:
Basically, this'll force everybody to put walk-on depth on scholarship. With the amount of money schools are swimming in these days, I think it's great.
Click to expand...
But why not add more quality talent? Maybe more 3 stars now. Taking a risk on a kid who may be talented, but smaller in stature. Taking a big DL who is overweight that you can trim down.

There are so many athletes that probably don't get D1 schollies who don't want to walk on OR can't afford to walk on that now will get a chance to play.

It'll just make teams deeper and more talented, but it'll be a good think for the kids that used to get passed by that will now get a chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg and Con
CrimsonTitles said:
But I suspect it'll only apply to the preferred walk one. I had a buddy in college who tried out for the team during walk on tryouts and made it. That type of walk-on is likely gone, and it's a shame. There's just not gonna be room for them anymore. I wonder if we still even hold tryouts.
Click to expand...
Imo, you can still try out and if you make the team, you'll automatically get added on scholarship. I don't see how that's any different from process for walk on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg
JustNeedMe81 said:
Imo, you can still try out and if you make the team, you'll automatically get added on scholarship. I don't see how that's any different from process for walk on?
Click to expand...
I just don't see how there's going to be any room for them at all on the roster.The rest of the 105 after the normal scholarship players will go to lower end scholarship players and preferred walk ons, leaving the rest without opportunities. That was my whole issue with the house settlement because it doesn't recognize the distinction between preferred walk ons, and regular walk ons. I was talking to Grok about this, and he said a lot of schools have already eliminated tryouts. Gone are the days of the feel-good stories where the walk on who didn't even play football in high school earns a spot on a P4 roster and becomes a key contributor.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads

Top Bottom
Back