I didn't make the initial claim. It's your responsibility to back up your assertion.You got a link to dispute it? Or just your opinion?
However, the justification is bodily autonomy, not the tragic 20% to which you refer.
I didn't make the initial claim. It's your responsibility to back up your assertion.You got a link to dispute it? Or just your opinion?
Fine, just leave the government out of the decision.My whole argument is to get out BEFORE the pregnancy and have the woman CHOOSE to not have unprotected sex. End of story.
Another newer study that says the same Here's another where 64% have multiple reasons for abortion, which don't include in rape, incest, or leaving an abusive relationship.Like you, I can only "answer" for myself.
Research indicates that more than half of those who end up having an abortion were using at least one method of birth control in the month prior to becoming pregnant, so your 20% seems erroneous.
Some were putting the onus solely on the woman to prevent pregnancy. Some took exception to that idea and made clear the man shares in that responsibility. Once the woman becomes pregnant she is in the driver's seat and has the final say.
I'd bet if you take a poll that all of us want to reduce the number of abortions when possible. It's absolutely true that abstinence would reduce that number, but for most people it is not realistic in any way and is therefore useful to a small percentage of people.
If we're serious about preventing unwanted pregnancies then we will employ sex education, easy and cheap/free access to birth control, and we will teach women to be strong in expressing their wishes and men to respect a woman's sexual autonomy.
Why should society spend taxpayer money on those things?
Because it benefits everyone.
The government is involved no matter which way you turn. The government is either forcing you to allow it, or the citizens are allowed to vote on the legality of abortion.Fine, just leave the government out of the decision.
No one has ever claimed here that a majority of abortions are due to sexual assault of any kind.Another newer study that says the same Here's another where 64% have multiple reasons for abortion, which don't include in rape, incest, or leaving an abusive relationship.
Cool. I think we agree here that unwanted pregnancies should be prevented whenever possible.I have consistently used the word "unprotected", as in I don't expect abstinence.
That's not quite how that statistic works. I'm not sure how you got to that conclusion from what was said, so I don't know how to help you understand it better other than to just say that the research was not on people using birth control (from which a good study could potentially reach a conclusion about birth control failure rates) but rather was research on the percent of women having an abortion who used birth control in the month prior to becoming pregnant. Even in the study I link below showing the >50% number it is not entirely clear if the method(s) employed were used perfectly. The usefulness despite that limitation is that we are looking at real world scenarios where BC use is not perfect. I most likely agree with you that perfection is a laudable goal since it would prevent unwanted pregnancies, but the real world is much sloppier than perfection.Are you really going with the statistic that birth control is only 50% effective? There would be far more people around if that were the case. Probably some fibbing going on in that study.
That last paragraph might seem a throwaway line, but if you ask me it's one of the more important statements from the study. Sex education can go a long way in preventing unwanted pregnancies and abortions.Results
In both years, slightly more than half of patients reported that they had used a contraceptive method in the month they became pregnant, though the decline from 54% in 2000 to 51% in 2014 was statistically significant (p=.011). The methods most commonly reported to have been used in the month the pregnancy began were condoms (28% and 24% in 2000 and 2014, p<.001) followed by the pill (14% and 13%, p=.12). There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of abortion patients who reported using long-acting reversible methods in the month they got pregnant (0.1% in 2000 vs. 1% in 2014, p<.001), and the estimated number of abortions attributed to these users was greater in 2014 than in 2000 (9500 vs. 1800).
Conclusions
Contraceptive use patterns of abortion patients were similar in both time periods, and changes in method use mirrored changes in contraceptive use among the larger population of women.
Implications
Postabortion contraception counseling has the potential to help nonusers find methods that meet their preferences and to help women better use their current methods.
That's an interesting spin. I guess the same can be said for gun rights, free speech, voting, and just about every other aspect of our lives. So much for that idea of small government, huh?The government is involved no matter which way you turn. The government is either forcing you to allow it, or the citizens are allowed to vote on the legality of abortion.
That's like saying the government is forcing you to allow people to go to church or to speak or to vote.The government is involved no matter which way you turn. The government is either forcing you to allow it, or the citizens are allowed to vote on the legality of abortion.
Which is a big part of my point since the majority of our governments, Federal and states, are composed of men. Personally, I find it relevant that, medically speaking, the mother's life comes first since the life of the fetus is dependent on hers. And do remember that there are more than a few in power who want access to birth control to be illegal, too. I'm not speaking of people commenting here. Clearly most of us consider birth control pretty important. As to whether or not we have access to it, men also have some say in that via your votes in elections.Fine, just leave the government out of the decision.
Why isn't the man always discussing "What would happen if..." with a woman before he has sex with her? We don't hear the critics asking that question very much. The woman is blamed instead. It takes two to tango.Why don't we put the blame for most elective abortions at the feet of the one's who are really responsible: men and boys.
If a man is not 100% willing to raise a baby/child, then he has no business having sex in the first place. And if she's not a 100% willing participant, then again, you should not be having sex with her. And if you don't understand birth control, aren't willing to raise a child, AND you don't understand how birth control works, how it fails, then again, you shouldn't be having sex. And, we simply must make men understand these topics before they make the mistake of fertilizing an egg they aren't man enough to take care of.
The whole abortion issue to me is purely a deep deflection of a man's true responsibility, understanding, and guilt and wanting to put the blame on the woman for the man's mistakes.
In a sexual assault situation, you are 100% correct. If the sex is consensual then where does the woman's agency magically go? They are both responsible equally. Does she not have an equal responsibility when it comes to birth control? Does she not have an equal responsibility to raise the child and be responsible just like he should? The blame is equally at both sets of feet in a consensual situation. Your post demeans women from the standpoint that it questions their ability to be responsible for their actions and seems to question their ability to make rational decisions. You might want to rethink your position.Why don't we put the blame for most elective abortions at the feet of the one's who are really responsible: men and boys.
If a man is not 100% willing to raise a baby/child, then he has no business having sex in the first place. And if she's not a 100% willing participant, then again, you should not be having sex with her. And if you don't understand birth control, aren't willing to raise a child, AND you don't understand how birth control works, how it fails, then again, you shouldn't be having sex. And, we simply must make men understand these topics before they make the mistake of fertilizing an egg they aren't man enough to take care of.
The whole abortion issue to me is purely a deep deflection of a man's true responsibility, understanding, and guilt and wanting to put the blame on the woman for the man's mistakes.
I'm not demeaning anyone except for men who don't take full 100% responsibility for their mistakes, men's lack of care and concern for their actions. It's exceedingly rare for men to be assaulted by women that ends up creating a pregnancy, etc.In a sexual assault situation, you are 100% correct. If the sex is consensual then where does the woman's agency magically go? They are both responsible equally. Does she not have an equal responsibility when it comes to birth control? Does she not have an equal responsibility to raise the child and be responsible just like he should? The blame is equally at both sets of feet in a consensual situation. Your post demeans women from the standpoint that it questions their ability to be responsible for their actions and seems to question their ability to make rational decisions. You might want to rethink your position.
Iowa requires a 2/3rds majority of both houses of the legislature in order to get a referendum on the ballot. Since both houses are dominated by Republicans, they will never let an abortion referendum end up on the ballot. The party of freedom.The Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled that a pro-choice referendum could not be placed on the fall ballot due to errors in the signature submission process. Here is an analysis of the court's ruling.
Note: the author, Adam Unikowsky, clerked for Antonin Scalia.
![]()
They didn't submit a photocopy that wasn't required
Why abortion won't be on the Arkansas ballot in Novemberadamunikowsky.substack.com
You didn't answer any of the questions I asked.I'm not demeaning anyone except for men who don't take full 100% responsibility for their mistakes, men's lack of care and concern for their actions. It's exceedingly rare for men to be assaulted by women that ends up creating a pregnancy, etc.
I hold the man 100% responsible for the woman getting pregnant. The man is almost always the instigator. If the woman seduces the man, well, that would be different. Without getting too graphic, it’s almost always the man that makes the first move. Once the water starts boiling, there’s no turning back unless the woman says no. If she does, it’s over.You didn't answer any of the questions I asked.
If both are consenting adults, then both are responsible.I hold the man 100% responsible for the woman getting pregnant. The man is almost always the instigator. If the woman seduces the man, well, that would be different. Without getting too graphic, it’s almost always the man that makes the first move. Once the water starts boiling, there’s no turning back unless the woman says no. If she does, it’s over.
they don't even bother trying to appear straight and honest. but it's uncivil to point out that these arbiters of "god's will" on earth are lying pieces of crapThe Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled that a pro-choice referendum could not be placed on the fall ballot due to errors in the signature submission process. Here is an analysis of the court's ruling.
Note: the author, Adam Unikowsky, clerked for Antonin Scalia.
![]()
They didn't submit a photocopy that wasn't required
Why abortion won't be on the Arkansas ballot in Novemberadamunikowsky.substack.com