Correct. People have been conditioned by movies and TV to think that whenever someone irks them in the slightest, they can bring a lawsuit. Well, technically, they can. But in the real world, most attorneys are out for the quick slam dunk, where they can send a single threatening letter, get a big settlement, and live happily ever after. If there's work involved and they take the case, it's usually because they're milking the client for money.
In a case like this, they would not only have to prove wrongdoing, but would have to prove that a subjective opinion was incorrect. Imagine that.
"Your honor, I call to the stand Mr. Gavin Ledbetter, a lifelong football fan, who will attest that Florida State looked like a high school in their conference championship game."
Funny you mention this because yesterday someone was complaining on the travel tech lab line about how in October she had left a Furnished Finder place and the woman hadn't given her $1,000 deposit back. Most of the Karens gave her the standard "take her to small claims court" and showed, for the most part, they don't have a damned clue about anything. There was also the, "call a lawyer."
I made the mistake of being the rational one. I told her it stunk, but it was going to cost her more money to get that $1,000 back than it would be worth, just cut your losses and go. But what was even funnier was I waited a bit until others responded and two of them stuck out:
1) I took one to small claims court, got a judgment against person, still hasn't paid me (DUH!)
2) our hearing is next month
I had one attorney tell me on one issue, "Look, you can pay me $2500 you don't have to get an injunction against X, but that will only last until V happens, and you'd be better doing Y."
But wouldn't it be nice to see a "My Cousin Vinny" Alabama lawyer having fun?
"Everything that Florida State guy just said is......"