Bama is in over FSU because..,,

crimsonaudio

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 9, 2002
68,975
84,989
462
crimsonaudio.net
The most interesting aspect to me is GEORGIA's loss to the SEC champ by 3 hurt them with a HUGE DROP far worse than TCU's loss did last year.

I "get" TCU "had" to get into the playoff...but really? Georgia drops five spots on a close loss to the SEC champs, TCU doesn't move AT ALL?
I think that has more to do with them falling below the five P5 champs than anything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Go Bama and B1GTide
Sep 30, 2002
1,730
2,209
282
Knoxville, TN USA
I'm guessing neither of those guys has the slightest clue how lawsuits actually work.
Correct. People have been conditioned by movies and TV to think that whenever someone irks them in the slightest, they can bring a lawsuit. Well, technically, they can. But in the real world, most attorneys are out for the quick slam dunk, where they can send a single threatening letter, get a big settlement, and live happily ever after. If there's work involved and they take the case, it's usually because they're milking the client for money.

In a case like this, they would not only have to prove wrongdoing, but would have to prove that a subjective opinion was incorrect. Imagine that.

"Your honor, I call to the stand Mr. Gavin Ledbetter, a lifelong football fan, who will attest that Florida State looked like a high school in their conference championship game."
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RammerJammer14

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
39,220
34,839
287
55
Correct. People have been conditioned by movies and TV to think that whenever someone irks them in the slightest, they can bring a lawsuit. Well, technically, they can. But in the real world, most attorneys are out for the quick slam dunk, where they can send a single threatening letter, get a big settlement, and live happily ever after. If there's work involved and they take the case, it's usually because they're milking the client for money.

In a case like this, they would not only have to prove wrongdoing, but would have to prove that a subjective opinion was incorrect. Imagine that.

"Your honor, I call to the stand Mr. Gavin Ledbetter, a lifelong football fan, who will attest that Florida State looked like a high school in their conference championship game."
Funny you mention this because yesterday someone was complaining on the travel tech lab line about how in October she had left a Furnished Finder place and the woman hadn't given her $1,000 deposit back. Most of the Karens gave her the standard "take her to small claims court" and showed, for the most part, they don't have a damned clue about anything. There was also the, "call a lawyer."

I made the mistake of being the rational one. I told her it stunk, but it was going to cost her more money to get that $1,000 back than it would be worth, just cut your losses and go. But what was even funnier was I waited a bit until others responded and two of them stuck out:

1) I took one to small claims court, got a judgment against person, still hasn't paid me (DUH!)
2) our hearing is next month

I had one attorney tell me on one issue, "Look, you can pay me $2500 you don't have to get an injunction against X, but that will only last until V happens, and you'd be better doing Y."


But wouldn't it be nice to see a "My Cousin Vinny" Alabama lawyer having fun?

"Everything that Florida State guy just said is......"
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigAlinKnoxville

Elefantman

Hall of Fame
Sep 18, 2007
6,593
5,115
187
R Can Saw
I can just see a Florida attorney showing up at the Rose Bowl on January 1st with a cease and desist order from a Leon county judge trying to stop the game. :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rolltide7854
Sep 30, 2002
1,730
2,209
282
Knoxville, TN USA
Funny you mention this because yesterday someone was complaining on the travel tech lab line about how in October she had left a Furnished Finder place and the woman hadn't given her $1,000 deposit back. Most of the Karens gave her the standard "take her to small claims court" and showed, for the most part, they don't have a damned clue about anything. There was also the, "call a lawyer."

I made the mistake of being the rational one. I told her it stunk, but it was going to cost her more money to get that $1,000 back than it would be worth, just cut your losses and go. But what was even funnier was I waited a bit until others responded and two of them stuck out:

1) I took one to small claims court, got a judgment against person, still hasn't paid me (DUH!)
2) our hearing is next month

I had one attorney tell me on one issue, "Look, you can pay me $2500 you don't have to get an injunction against X, but that will only last until V happens, and you'd be better doing Y."


But wouldn't it be nice to see a "My Cousin Vinny" Alabama lawyer having fun?

"Everything that Florida State guy just said is......"
Yep. Even when someone "wins" their case, the courts don't enforce payment. So the losing party can simply refuse to pay the judgment.