PDX Gator, if someone from Vanderbilt or some other team now goes to gouge Tebows eyes, something that I would never want to see, do you think the player that did that should only be suspended half a game?:BigA::BigA::BigA:
I guess my answer is, it depends, it depends on what the standard is for punishing such behavior...
Why don't many the SEC football experts on this site list for me all of the suspensions the SEC has handed down for similar behavior, when there was no flag called on the initial play...
What is your argument, based on facts and past precedent, that suspending Spikes for half a game is too lenient?
Do you have a single example where another SEC coach handed down a harsher punishment in a similar situation?
Since Bama fans "ooze class with every pore" please list for me all of the times that the great Bama coaches of yore have suspended bama players for on field transgressions similar to the Spikes incident.
I heard that Rolando McClain actually lost his temper and pushed a referee in the Va Tech game.
Was he suspended for 2 or 3 games, I forget.
Basically, if Spikes lost his temper and hauled off and hit another player in a fight, by rule he would have been suspended for one half of the next game.
Why isn't that the proper punishment in this situation?
Unless someone among the hundreds of posters here who seem to be losing sleep over the welfare of one UGA TB Washaun Easley can point to another rule, another prior situation, another example where another coach punished his own player for doing something dirty like Spikes did, your arguments and complaints aren't very persuasive.