I'm not sure how you reached your conclusion based on my post. I've never said that wealth inequality is a good thing and if I've ever written anything that gave you that impression, I obviously failed to make myself clear. This country needs more revenue, period. It needs to spend considerably less, period. Failing to do both will just leave us flying in circles. I don't deny my contempt for the envious "eat the rich" people, but I do agree that the wealthy should be shelling out more taxes.I just don't understand how you think the insane wealth inequality in this nation is ok and healthy. If you're rich, you diversify so you can keep your wealth in any kind of economy. These near-trillionaires have already "invested" in every sector that makes sense and now they are buying up starter-homes, potable water, arable land; just because they have too much money.
We need to do what Europe is doing and enact a wealth tax. These super-rich would never feel it and we have too many poor that we need to take care of and we need to stop pricing out young home-buyers. There are great reasons Eisenhower had a 95% income tax on the super rich. Kennedy got elected and wanted it brought down because he was a richie but the evidence is overwhelming that we are gravely out of balance.
This is the way to fix the debt.