Re: Clay Travis Says We Are In Potential Trouble
If this gets picked up by one of the major news outlets, then I'll get worried. I'll admit that I have no idea what an "approved" event by the compliance department might look like, but the pictures don't exactly look of the planned/professional type...looks very casual. Surely, surely TR has been told what is and isn't appropriate when signing memorabilia and having photos taken in a business with the business owner.
An approved event could be as simple as this:
Trent: This guy at the mall asked me if I would mind signing a helmet and jersey for him to display in his store. Is that cool?
UA Compliance: Did he offer you anything in return?
Trent: No, he was asking me if I could do him a favor.
UA Compliance: Did he say whether or not it was for a function or event?
Trent: No, he just said it would great if I wouldn't mind stopping by and signing a few things sometime.
UA Compliance: It's fine as long as he doesn't offer you, or any other University of Alabama student-athlete, any sort of benefit. You can sign Jerseys, Helmets, Pictures, and any other memorabilia for any fan, just like at UA fan day, as long as there is no impermissible benefit being offered.
Trent: Cool. What about taking pictures with fans and stuff? What if he wants to take pictures while I'm signing this stuff?
UA Compliance: That's fine, as well, as long as there's no benefit just like with the autographs. It's probably best, though, if if you make sure it's not a public event. If the store wants to have a public event they need to coordinate that through the University. Contact the store owner and let him know that it's okay for you to sign stuff under these terms. If he agrees, then set up a date and time for you to do this and let us know when it will be.
Trent: Will do. Thanks.
Seriously, that literally could be - and probably should be - exactly how this sort of thing should be handled by the student athlete and the compliance department and how it went down in this case. In fact, it wouldn't make a difference, from an eligibility standpoint, for Trent to have done the signing right then and there when the guy asked him, and then asked the compliance department about it. The compliance department would then have asked Trent about the details, contact the store owner about the details, and then made a decision regarding the event. The wording though, about it being "approved" by UA compliance, makes it seem as though they knew about it beforehand.