Government Shutdown

  • HELLO AGAIN, Guest! We are back, live! We're still doing some troubleshooting and maintenance to fix a few remaining issues but everything looks stable now (except front page which we're working on over next day or two)

    Thanks for your patience and support! MUCH appreciated! --Brett (BamaNation)

    if you see any problems - please post them in the Troubleshooting board!

There you go....got me all figured out! ;)

It is not that hard. Trump supporters always claim that people attack Trump because they don't see his genius and accomplishments, while Trump supporters can't really name these accomplishments.
It is Ok. Like I said, Trump is a great salesman, who can convince his supporters that he is a Messiah
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide
Dont confuse activity with accomplishment...

Trump's dementia?

The guy has accomplished more in 10 months than any president I can remember.

Much of it trying to repair the damage from the previous WH tenet!

Must be driving the Trump haters crazy....lol......
 
  • Like
Reactions: UAH and 92tide
.it's gotten to the point that the Trump haters are running out of legitimate issues to complain about.
spit-drink-shocked.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bamaro
So the rest of us taxpayers have been subsidizing him and his lovely wife to the tune of approx $1,250 per month so they can enjoy their early retirement. Nice gig if you can get it.
It’s easy to roll your eyes at the political spin, but Klobuchar’s point is fair. The enhanced ACA tax credits weren’t giveaways; they were real middle-class tax relief. They helped people who’ve worked their whole lives, retired a few years before Medicare, and no longer have job-based coverage keep their insurance without draining their savings.

If those credits expire, premiums for many early retirees could jump from around $400 a month to over $1,500. That isn’t an exaggeration; it’s what happens when the tax credit formula reverts to the old version.

What’s frustrating is how differently people treat tax breaks depending on who benefits. Some conservatives are fine with tax cuts that mainly help corporations or the wealthy, but see middle-class tax relief as too expensive. It’s a double standard that says a lot about whose struggles get taken seriously.

This isn’t about handouts; it’s about basic fairness. Early retirees shouldn’t be priced out of coverage just because their version of a tax break helps ordinary families instead of the top one percent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide and PaulD
It’s easy to roll your eyes at the political spin, but Klobuchar’s point is fair. The enhanced ACA tax credits weren’t giveaways; they were real middle-class tax relief. They helped people who’ve worked their whole lives, retired a few years before Medicare, and no longer have job-based coverage keep their insurance without draining their savings.

If those credits expire, premiums for many early retirees could jump from around $400 a month to over $1,500. That isn’t an exaggeration; it’s what happens when the tax credit formula reverts to the old version.

What’s frustrating is how differently people treat tax breaks depending on who benefits. Some conservatives are fine with tax cuts that mainly help corporations or the wealthy, but see middle-class tax relief as too expensive. It’s a double standard that says a lot about whose struggles get taken seriously.

This isn’t about handouts; it’s about basic fairness. Early retirees shouldn’t be priced out of coverage just because their version of a tax break helps ordinary families instead of the top one percent.
Look, you can call it what you want. tax relief, tax credit, subsidy, handout, charity, it doesn't change a thing. It is money, seized from the American taxpayer and given to the insurance shopper to try and offset the crazy cost of the Obamacare insurance policies because Obamacare has become a boondoggle like many of us predicted. And BTW, the credits aren't just for the middle class (whatever middle class means these days). Everyone qualifies except the rich (whatever rich means these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CrimsonJazz
It’s easy to roll your eyes at the political spin, but Klobuchar’s point is fair. The enhanced ACA tax credits weren’t giveaways; they were real middle-class tax relief. They helped people who’ve worked their whole lives, retired a few years before Medicare, and no longer have job-based coverage keep their insurance without draining their savings.

If those credits expire, premiums for many early retirees could jump from around $400 a month to over $1,500. That isn’t an exaggeration; it’s what happens when the tax credit formula reverts to the old version.

What’s frustrating is how differently people treat tax breaks depending on who benefits. Some conservatives are fine with tax cuts that mainly help corporations or the wealthy, but see middle-class tax relief as too expensive. It’s a double standard that says a lot about whose struggles get taken seriously.

This isn’t about handouts; it’s about basic fairness. Early retirees shouldn’t be priced out of coverage just because their version of a tax break helps ordinary families instead of the top one percent.
I find it incredible that you're defending a situation where the average taxpayer - who could never afford 'early retirement' - should be on the hook to subsidize the healthcare of those who are significantly more wealthy than they are.

SMH
 
  • Like
Reactions: CrimsonJazz

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads