Kerry Camp Imploding: Infidelity

I think it's a Dean ploy to kick start his appeal...
icon7.gif


[This message has been edited by Displaced Bama Fan (edited 02-12-2004).]
 
Now, students, time for politics 101:

1. Wesley Clark, the candidate closest to the Clintons, spilled the beans on Kerry.

2. Wesley did it in front of 12 reporters whom he told Kerry's intern problem was "off the record." (Anyone who believes 12 reporters are going to keep a secret is too dumb to command a Boy Scout troop, much less NATO. Even if all 12 kept their word, a least one is going to post an anonymous e-mail to Drudge.)

3. As Rush Limbaugh phrased it today: I've told everyone to pay attention to the Bush campaign. The Clintons are going to take care of this year's Democrat nominee. They want to clear the way for Hillary's race in 2008."

4. Although major news networks and magazines have been working on this story for weeks, they are slow to follow up. It gripes their guts that Drudge has beaten them again. They snootily don't consider him a "journalist," just a scandal monger.

[This message has been edited by Pachydermatous (edited 02-12-2004).]
 
Rush's idea that the Clinton's don't want to see a Democrat in the White House in 2004 is ridiculous. Rush must be high on narcotics again. The saddest part is that he still seems to have an audience.
 
Wow. This is like watching a bad football game. Every other day it's something new! I'm starting to wonder if there might be something to that "Billary conspiracy" after all...
 
Yes it is up and down, interesting to watch. Yesterday, I especially enjoyed seeing Dubya's mouthpiece, Scott McClelland or whatever his name is, protesting against gutter politics.
But as long as it's Drudge and Rush leading the charge into the gutter everything's fine.
 
Chukkie ---

You need at least a slight contact with your masters high up in the Democrat hierarchy. The Clintons' maneuvers are the talk of the town at that level. Think (if you can) about 2008. Hillary will need a VP running mate, nicht wahr? Who else but loyal, old Wesley who planted the knife squarely between Kerry's shoulder blades? Politicians always pay their debts and the Clintons owe Wesley big time.

I'll give you another hint: Bush didn't do it. Joe Kines didn't do it. Probably even Logan Young was innocent. Gen. Clark, he done it.
 
I hate to tell you Chukker, but this is the Dems imploding themselves. Clark is the Clinton's little lap dog. They want him to be the candidate so he can lose and pave the way for Hillary in 2008. It's pretty much a well known fact.

You do expect the Repubs NOT to take the ball and run with it, when the Dems themselves have let the cat out of the bag????? Hmmmmmm???
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
 
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Chukker Veteran:
Rush's idea that the Clinton's don't want to see a Democrat in the White House in 2004 is ridiculous. Rush must be high on narcotics again. The saddest part is that he still seems to have an audience.</font>

Why would this be so ridiculous? Let's face it, if a Dem wins the WH in '04, it would be difficult to run a Dem (hillary) against him in '08. Especially if he proves to be a popular president.

The Dems, and especially the clintons can't allow an incumbent Dem in '08 because if clinton doesn't run in '08, she risks becoming irrelevant and her time will have passed.
 
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Pachydermatous:
Chukkie ---

You need at least a slight contact with your masters high up in the Democrat hierarchy. The Clintons' maneuvers are the talk of the town at that level. Think (if you can) about 2008. Hillary will need a VP running mate, nicht wahr? Who else but loyal, old Wesley who planted the knife squarely between Kerry's shoulder blades? Politicians always pay their debts and the Clintons owe Wesley big time.

I'll give you another hint: Bush didn't do it. Joe Kines didn't do it. Probably even Logan Young was innocent. Gen. Clark, he done it.
</font>

eheh
biggrin2.gif


lol.gif
 
Puckie, I'm surprised your ear is attuned to the VIP Democratic circles. Must be good to have such inside sources. Oh wait, I forgot who your sources are, Rush and Drudge.
Makes for a good cheap shot, but surely you aren't gullible enough to really believe the Clintons want to see Dubya re-elected.
 
Chukkie ---

Lest you little ones forget, it was Drudge who broke the Clinton-Monica story when big media was trying to sit on it. Even then it took the "real journalists" four days before they would even admit there was a story afoot. Don't ever bet against Drudge. He even had sources inside the Clinton White House.

As for the Clintons wanting Dubya re-elected, you'd better believe it. Kerry in the White House might be good for two terms which would make Hillary a senior citizen before she ever got a chance to run. They're betting on the Republicans running true to form: following one highly successful president with a complete Dodo who would be easy to beat.
 
I can only hope you guys are pulling my leg. Surely you can't be so far gone you really believe the Clinton's prefer Dubya to any Democrat being elected in 2004.
 
Chuckie

Reread Pachy.

Pachy, you do good thinking.

Every person who has ever followed the Clinton's blood trail knows they are capable of anything.
 
I'm sure you people thought it was perfectly reasonable when Dan Burton shot up those watermelons trying to prove Foster had been murdered involving the Clintons.
 
It's odd how two relatively wellinformed people can form the opposite opinions about people they have never met, and both with access to the same information.
 
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads