Looking like the following for assistants...

I have to point out that I said this several times during the season, and even last season I pointed out the vulnerabilities in overly relying on the passing game... I just want to get that out there, since it's easy to be like yeah in hindsight that was a bad idea.
Tua's big play ability is like a cheat button. It's great, you hit it, oh look, 7 points. Done. The problem is it allows you to develop other bad habits in the process, but who cares right? So what if you don't have a smashmouth running game? Who cares if you're not taking advantage of the short stuff, I mean Tua can throw into coverage and come away with 7 points, what's not to like? It doesn't even matter if the defense gives up points because you'll just score more.
Until the cheat doesn't work, and then you're in trouble (or even worse you get punished for using the cheat). That's why you don't rely on it. Because it won't work 100% of the time and to win a championship you need to be able to win 100% of your games. No one here is saying take the deep ball away from Tua, but what they are saying, and rightly so, is Tua and the Alabama offense can not be reliant on it.
If Alabama goes into the Clemson game more focused on running the ball, and more willing to take the lower hanging fruit in the passing game (remember, Tua had two interceptions, both of which resulted in points for the other team, essentially negating everything Alabama did on offense), it would have been a completely different game. Sure, Alabama might not win most of their games by 6 touchdowns if they rely less on the cheat button, but they'd be more consistent on offense.
Our running game didn't really become a consistent force until Deonte Brown took over for Lester Cotton; it regressed when Brown was injured. His suspension was the point at which I really started to get nervous, precisely because it put us in a position where we couldn't depend on the running game.

We've got LOTS of returning skill positions, but I'm most concerned about the OL.
 
It hurts to read these quotes, but I do agree with you both.

Indeed, but, it hurt a whole lot worse to see the results. Over the past 11 years it has been Bama inflicting that kind of pain on most everyone else. The two-headed monster of probable defeat reared it's rare and ugly head. No more, please.

ROLL TIDE!
 
Our running game didn't really become a consistent force until Deonte Brown took over for Lester Cotton; it regressed when Brown was injured. His suspension was the point at which I really started to get nervous, precisely because it put us in a position where we couldn't depend on the running game.

We've got LOTS of returning skill positions, but I'm most concerned about the OL.

I doubt it would have made much difference if Brown had played. Not against Clemson's defensive front. Fortunately, they will most likely be in the NFL this coming season.
 
Our running game didn't really become a consistent force until Deonte Brown took over for Lester Cotton; it regressed when Brown was injured. His suspension was the point at which I really started to get nervous, precisely because it put us in a position where we couldn't depend on the running game.

We've got LOTS of returning skill positions, but I'm most concerned about the OL.[/QUOTE]

That would be me as well.
 
Our running game didn't really become a consistent force until Deonte Brown took over for Lester Cotton; it regressed when Brown was injured. His suspension was the point at which I really started to get nervous, precisely because it put us in a position where we couldn't depend on the running game.

We've got LOTS of returning skill positions, but I'm most concerned about the OL.


I understand that point of view. Personally, WAY more concerned with the Def Line.
 
I mean, what do you think Lawrence was doing all night against us? Hand off or Renfrow option routes on first and second down to try to make the 3rd down manageable. They mostly did not work. On 3rd down he was looking for shots and, unlike Clemson's defense, our defense was allowing his guys to consistently come open off the snaps especially to the defensive left side.
. It seemed most of his throws were to his right. Well , the mid to deep throws anyway! Don’t know if that was a defensive anomaly or a tendency for Lawrence. It may have been the norm for our defense, I didn’t track all year or even thought about it. In the passing game, it Seemed we were an equal opportunity defense most of the year
 
Our running game didn't really become a consistent force until Deonte Brown took over for Lester Cotton; it regressed when Brown was injured. His suspension was the point at which I really started to get nervous, precisely because it put us in a position where we couldn't depend on the running game

Agreed. We were a much better OL when Brown was able to play and losing him in the title game hurt more than we thought it would.
 
CNS said in a recent speech that a big difference in 2018 is that our coaches did not develop relationships with our players. I assume this is at least a significant contribution to the turnover in on field staff.
 
So how does everyone feel about this staff? Personally I am pretty happy about it. Like most of us, I am a little nervous about Golding being the DC (an assumption), but Coach knows best, and I think that the coaches we brought in are all very experienced professional football coaches who can help us.

rtr
 
So how does everyone feel about this staff? Personally I am pretty happy about it. Like most of us, I am a little nervous about Golding being the DC (an assumption), but Coach knows best, and I think that the coaches we brought in are all very experienced professional football coaches who can help us.

rtr

I feel that this staff is a direct reflection of cns' ability to run and sustaion a successful program. Just look at it this way ... we made it all the way to a NC appearance with all of the issues we had with last year's staff. I'm thinking our future remains bright we the new additions.
 
You know, the AJC here in Georgia has really poo-pooed Sarkisian and said his offense wasn't that great, but never took into account the injuries and some of the other factors. Their offensive production was like 6th in the NFL.............their real problem like most years was their defense. I have some questions about Sarkisian, but it isn't his ability with QBs and offense.............but I think he probably proves many wrong. I hope he is extremely successful and stays for awhile and gets himself a ring

Anyone who trusts the ajc sports writers too much deserves to get poo pooed
 
So how does everyone feel about this staff? Personally I am pretty happy about it. Like most of us, I am a little nervous about Golding being the DC (an assumption), but Coach knows best, and I think that the coaches we brought in are all very experienced professional football coaches who can help us.

rtr

I like the staff. I think it's a good blend of young up-and-coming coaches, older more experienced coaches, and good recruiters. I'm really looking forward to seeing Tua's development and how our offensive philosophy might change with Sark as OC.
 
Mike Stoops joins Alabama staff in a off the field position. [emoji102]
9c3d6b54af3d982ef938613fc735cc27.jpg


Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads