I am quite sure that I need to read the rule book regarding pick plays. I am convinced that I have no idea what IS a pick play. I thought I saw some, but, the refs have eyes too and called it not once.
I do see a couple of typos so I apologize.
. In short, my point is the offense scored 31 points. If you had told most people on this forum before the game started that our offense would generate 31 points, they would have been satisfied with our offensive production and thought we would have won.Saw a lot of that tonight. I guess people are tired of Bama winning and will do whatever to keep it from happening.
He's just saying that we overcame a lot this season to be where we are and in the end, Clemson did what they needed to do to win. part of the game.
I think it could have made a difference, but I completely understand why Saban wanted to stick with Kiffin. The transition to a new play caller is a risky thing, and Kiffin was absolutely masterful in the playoff last year. He faced two competent defenses and torched both of them with some great play calling. I don't think Saban imagined even a distracted Kiffin was going to have the issues he apparently has in the Washington game. Turn back the clock, and yeah I think he'd have turned to Sark then to, but in a perfect world Kiffin goes out there in the playoffs and does as good a job as he did last year. There was no way Sark was going to have the same upside because Sark was never going to have time to install his offense.
yeah but what about the other 57 minutes that led up to that??? he has got to develop as a passer...or I hope we find someone that can
Clemson ran 99 plays against our defense. That is entirely the offenses fault and the reason they scored 35 points. 99 plays is absolutely absurd.
yeah, I'm thinking this just ensured us at least 5 more years of Saban for real
