This post is to clarify exactly where the breakdown occurred. To me, this is important, although some other posters have said it's not to them. Just my nature, I guess. The employee primarily responsible in the AD is named Dever. He looks at the actual vouchers. His boss is named Almond, who signs off on what Dever does. The Supe Store shares responsibility for the book accounts. As I remember, there were three reprimands handed out to Dever, Almond and the SS mgr (could have been an assistant mgr). Dever was denied a raise. I don't know if the other two were. But all three are still in place, drawing a paycheck.
Now, I'm among the group who think the AD needs to be reorganized from the top to the bottom, because I think the NCAA (as well as some of us) are getting tired of looking at the same faces every time there's another screw-up. So, if anyone wants to condemn the whole AD system, I'm with you. What is absolutely not accurate is to blame Compliance for this particular screw-up (not saying we have great Compliance). All Compliance did was convey the self-report to the NCAA.