Science: Space - the final frontier (Misc.)

Status
Not open for further replies.

CrimsonNagus

Hall of Fame
Jun 6, 2007
9,775
8,747
212
46
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
A leak wasn't detected until today. Maybe my wife was right when she sarcastically said that using engines from 1998 was a bad idea.

I got to be honest, I get more excited for SpaceX because of how slow NASA moves. Why will it take almost 2 years for NASA to be ready to go again after this first test and almost 4 years to land someone on the moon?
 
Last edited:

AlistarWills

Hall of Fame
Jul 26, 2006
5,641
3,465
187
A leak wasn't detected until today. Maybe my wife was right when she sarcastic said that using engines from 1998 was a bad idea.

I got to be honest, I get more excited for SpaceX because of how slow NASA moves. Why will it take almost 2 years for NASA to be ready to go again after this first test and almost 4 years to land someone on the moon?
I heard them say that the leak in question wasn’t something they would have seen without fully loading the fuel tanks. Since that wasn’t something they would do without prepping to launch, today was their first chance to see it.
There was also some temperature anomaly with one of the main engines.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: Bazza

Bamaro

TideFans Legend
Oct 19, 2001
28,842
14,220
287
Jacksonville, Md USA
A leak wasn't detected until today. Maybe my wife was right when she sarcastically said that using engines from 1998 was a bad idea.

I got to be honest, I get more excited for SpaceX because of how slow NASA moves. Why will it take almost 2 years for NASA to be ready to go again after this first test and almost 4 years to land someone on the moon?
Funding may have something to do with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TideFans.shop - 25% off Fan Favorites!

TideFans.shop - 25% off!

20oz Tervis Tumbler
20oz Tervis Tumbler from TideFansStore.com

Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads