TIDE-HSV said:
Normally he's a pretty level-headed poster who realizes that an opponent's board the day after a game including a call like that is not really the right place to argue...
I can understand LSU fans wanting to take up for their team.
However, even the drunkest LSU fan has to admit that was an
atrocious non-call of interference. There's no way to defend that.
Am I saying the refs were cheating for LSU? I doubt it. But, it does re-enforce my beliefs that we have the
worst officials in college football. How can we justify ourselves to be a "premiere" conference when we have such an inept crew of officials? This problem didn't start Saturday, and it's not just confined to Bama. Ask Florida. Ask Arkansas (that idiotic official who blew his whistle before the S.C. player received the punt, who eventually fumbled).
Did the non-call make a difference in the game? Sorry, TexasTigers..but, it did. Bama would have had the ball at the one with first and goal, and there was a 99.9% chance it woudl jhave been a touchdown, thus giving Bama a 17-6 lead and the field position would have stayed in Bama's favor at that point. You guys might would have won the game, but the score would not have been 26-10. If LSU had won, it would have been more like a score of 20-17. It makes a
huge difference.
You can spin it, you can argue it, but the fact is, the bad non-call of interference made all the difference in the world for a team who already had odds stacked against them. You can't take that away from them.