I wasn't kidding seebell. She is pure evil.
In case you needed another reason to not vote for Hillary...
![]()
Gee, I never would have thought so much antipathy against our 1st female president to be.:eek2:
If Obama was too inexperienced for the White House then so is Lyin Ted. Must be a matter of political belief rather than experience.
We have Hillary Clinton  while you were alive, while you were sexually active, three years ago  saying marriage is just between a man and a woman. ...
And yet many people in [the gay community] are supporting Hillary, and their reason for supporting her is that "she was always in favor of gay rights, but she had to say what she had to to be elected." …
She came out in favor of the pacific trade deal, very strongly in favor of it, and now she’s against it.
And that’s not seen as flip-flopping, it’s not really seen as a revelation or learning something  it’s seen as "she is politically expedient, and we want someone who is politically expedient."
The followers of Hillary Clinton seem to think they have a secret deal with her  where they understand what she really believes, what she’s really going to do  and they are willing to support her as she bends the truth in order to be elected. …
Why do the people who support Hillary think that what she’s saying is to manipulate other people and not to manipulate them?
I love all the excuses, why can't they just admit that she is simply unlikable and has never earned our respect or trust?
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/276078-clintons-dismal-approval-ratings-prompt-dem-fears
The thing that bothers me most about Hillary as president is not that she's unable to lead - i think she can, she's a strong willed person, without question.
My concern is her reputation for lying, for doing whatever need be in order to benefit her and her cronies. Handing her the power of the presidency seems like leaving the fox in charge of the henhouse.
I just don't who some folks like her. Heck, I know Hillary supporters that don't like or trust her, he just think she's the best option of the four. Absolutely insane.
I don't trust her as C-I-C of the armed forces. That is scary as hell.
Are you kidding? She will show much more restraint than any of the "carpet bomb 'em back to the stone age" republicans
no she won't she is as much of a chicken hawk as anyone the GOP has put up in years
Guess that leaves me "feeling the Bern" then.![]()
Are you kidding? She will show much more restraint than any of the "carpet bomb 'em back to the stone age" republicans
Democrats have a decision to make: do they think money in politics is a corrupting force that influences the decisions made by elected officials, or not? After years railing against the Citizens United decision, which opened the floodgates to outside spending in elections, some of them appear to have done a complete reversal.
The Clinton campaign has spent the last few weeks furiously pushing back at the criticism that she is influenced by the vast donations her campaign receives from backers in the oil and financial industries. Her supporters have been vigorously arguing there’s no evidence of a quid pro quo.
How quickly they forget. As journalist David Sirota reported earlier this week, in the 2008 Democratic primary campaign, Clinton harshly criticized then senator Obama for accepting donations from oil and gas executives – and even cut a campaign commercial about it. The kicker? It was less money than Clinton has accepted from people working for fossil fuel companies so far this campaign season.
Chamberlain used ' restraint'.