The thought of Tubby on the sidelines of Coleman Coliseum in red is really exciting to me!
Too. Much. Information.
The thought of Tubby on the sidelines of Coleman Coliseum in red is really exciting to me!
Back to the idea of Tubby Smith... anyone have any insight on what the real chances of this would be if we have an opening at the end of the year? The thought of Tubby on the sidelines of Coleman Coliseum in red is really exciting to me!
Back to the idea of Tubby Smith... anyone have any insight on what the real chances of this would be if we have an opening at the end of the year? The thought of Tubby on the sidelines of Coleman Coliseum in red is really exciting to me!
Here's the information you need.... Tubby makes $2.5M a year base with incentives up to $3.3M per year.
Gottfried makes $1M per year.
Do the math - I can't see us hiring a guy at $2.5M right now. My guess is they'll go with someone they can get for $1.2-1.6 who has a lot of upside. Look for a minor team to make a run in the NCAAs who's been there before.... I don't have any names but that's where I bet we'll end up going.
The memory of Kentucky's collapse on his watch is still fresh on my mind.
To correct some on CM, I didn't mean that he would have no influence. His opinion is always sought, but it's just not to the degree I'd assumed. On Tubby, I now think we'll end up with a younger "up-and-comer," rather than a big-time big name. A case can be made that having two big names in an AD at the same time most times leads to trouble. It would take two very special egos to coexist. There aren't many examples of where it has worked, long-term. I don't consider Meyer and Donovan to be "long-term" yet. Anyway, I feel this is the way we'll end up going, and that would rule out the Tubbys, Caliparis, etc...
To correct some on CM, I didn't mean that he would have no influence. His opinion is always sought, but it's just not to the degree I'd assumed. On Tubby, I now think we'll end up with a younger "up-and-comer," rather than a big-time big name. A case can be made that having two big names in an AD at the same time most times leads to trouble. It would take two very special egos to coexist. There aren't many examples of where it has worked, long-term. I don't consider Meyer and Donovan to be "long-term" yet. Anyway, I feel this is the way we'll end up going, and that would rule out the Tubbys, Caliparis, etc...
One of the shortcomings of being an SEC Basketball School, is that we are thought of as a 2nd Tier Conference by many.......with the Big East, ACC claiming much more media focus. With that said......If we lose CMG, I'd like to see us find someone that will give us more than 4-5 years....so I guess I'm more inclined to find the 30-something that has something to prove!!
My vote would be for someone who has proven that he can get the job done. Of course, proving it somewhere else doesn't mean much when it comes to SEC schools (how many great coaches did UTK go through before they got Pearl? And has Pearl proven that he can do it in the long haul?).
I would darn sure talk with CM, Wimp, and anyone else who has proven himself in the wars, before making this decision. I just hope that it is a committed decision, whether the new guy is 57 or 30 years old. Every sport at Alabama deserves the best chance of success that we can give it. I want to win. Hopefully the new guy will take us places we've only ever dreamt of.
rtr
Anthony Grant would be my #1 target.
Good post eyeshade. You are right about two good programs/coaches co-existing. It certainly can be done. Happened in the 70s at Bama and hopefully will happen again. It makes me very sad to see what's happened to Bama's basketball program. I agree that we need someone who can coach fundamentals and develop a real team. Andy by the way, CNS does go to some other events on campus, I know he was at the December graduation ceremony because we saw him there when my son graduated. RTR