This explains why so few white males are elected to public office.Actually, there are many people who will vote against Trump solely because he is a white male.
This explains why so few white males are elected to public office.Actually, there are many people who will vote against Trump solely because he is a white male.
Doesn’t matter. Army rules are that when you accept a CSM promotion you are expected to serve 2 years or get chaptered out. Hence why his retirement reads E-8 instead of E-9.
grievances over manufactured outrages is literally all they have to offerHe served over two decades of his life in the NG. He decided to retire and the NG said it was OK. No one should have a problem with that, particularly since he would have requested out months prior to being notified his unit would be deployed. On top of that, the NG could have told him an emphatic no. This is all a manufactured outrage.
betty?Meanwhile, loser Trump is calling the black woman running against him a five letter B-word.
He's losing to a black woman, the kind of person he holds the most contempt for and he's losing it.
ETA: It's a shame we can't post a link to articles about this because of the language. The articles are out there.
He served over two decades of his life in the NG. He decided to retire and the NG said it was OK. No one should have a problem with that, particularly since he would have requested out months prior to being notified his unit would be deployed. On top of that, the NG could have told him an emphatic no. This is all a manufactured outrage.
When did he submit his retirement request?
Just being honest.Yeah, well, that's a stupid reason too.
I can admit it and agree with someone I usually don't agree with about other things.
That’s not the issue. The issue is that he has paraded around the idea that he was a “a retired Command Sergeant Major†and even was paid the retirement benefits associated with that rank until it came to light and the military corrected it.
I don’t think it’s extreme as Vance went with it but it’s quite of a substantial leap from saying “only 4 enlisted members of the entire enlisted ranks outranked me upon retirement†to “only 1% of the enlisted force outranked me upon retirementâ€Â.
He didn’t fulfill the qualifications to maintain that rank and has dodged it like the plague since 2008 when being called out for it and questioned about the timing of it. Now instead of being just a Minnesota news story it’s a national one.
But then again… when Dubya was questioned along the same lines Democrats were so ready to crucify him.
I, like most people, know Next to nothing about how military rank vs retired military rank works. I also am not all that familiar with the timing of Walz' claims and statements, how/when they happened, and all the rest.
It just looks like republicans throwing shpagetti against the wall to see what will stick at this point.
So far no one has put together a cogent and coherent reasonable and complete timeline to help us understand.
Personally I see Waltz more like Dubya with regards to military service. There are questions about their willingness to actually fight if called upon, but there is no question that they served honorably and got out the same.
Swift Boaters gonna Swift Boat.![]()
Tim Walz’s military service record: What we can VERIFY
VERIFY answers questions about Tim Walz’s military service, including if he retired before his National Guard unit deployed to Iraq and whether he saw combat.www.kens5.com
Seems time to move on. Nothing is gonna stick from this.
You have to serve for two years at a rank in order to be retired at that rank.I, like most people, know Next to nothing about how military rank vs retired military rank works. I also am not all that familiar with the timing of Walz' claims and statements, how/when they happened, and all the rest.
It just looks like republicans throwing shpagetti against the wall to see what will stick at this point.
So far no one has put together a cogent and coherent reasonable and complete timeline to help us understand.
He gives new meaning to: rambling diatribesTrump is not cognitively well.