Yet more evidence that the US pays for almost everything. We're like Big Daddy in "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof".For decades, young people in this hillside village have had two options: harvest corn or head north.
So many left, to work as gardeners and cooks in Southern California, that the money they sent home fueled an economic transformation.
The small adobe homes in this Zapotec community of about 2,500 people gave way to two-story cement houses with wrought-iron gates. Roads were paved. A basketball court rose near the town center.
But as the Trump administration has pushed many of Quialana’s sons and daughters back to Mexico, and prompted many of those who remain in the United States to cut back on work, much of the once-steady construction in the village has come to a halt. Now the gates hide the unfinished walls of “California-style” facades.
$60 BILLION crossed the border, and I'd venture to say untaxed. While the middle class American sucker has their wages siphoned by the government, paycheck after paycheck, on top of having to battle inflation at the register.Amid crackdown, Mexicans are sending less money home. It’s leaving a mark.
Yet more evidence that the US pays for almost everything. We're like Big Daddy in "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof".
We don't. I think it is a total number of foreign-born, but many of them are US citizens or permanent residents.Wait, there are 55 MILLION foreigners here on visas???
Typical...We don't. I think it is a total number of foreign-born, but many of them are US citizens or permanent residents.
No idea why AP has published this nonsense and other media has re-printed it. It is all over the news right now in left and right wing media
I looked up the number of foreign-born in the last census and I do not think the number was nearly that high and that number included naturalized American citizens of foreign birth, those with in the US green cards, those on a visa of some type. I do not recall if the number included illegal immigrants. Probably, since the census does not ask about immigration status, just country of birth of whatever status.We don't. I think it is a total number of foreign-born, but many of them are US citizens or permanent residents.
No idea why AP has published this nonsense and other media has re-printed it. It is all over the news right now in left and right wing media
A new Pew Research Center analysis of Census Bureau data finds that, as of June 2025:I looked up the number of foreign-born in the last census and I do not think the number was nearly that high and that number included naturalized American citizens of foreign birth, those with in the US green cards, those on a visa of some type. I do not recall if the number included illegal immigrants. Probably, since the census does not ask about immigration status, just country of birth of whatever status.
Found it.
46.2 million (estimated in 2022).
My point was that no country in human history has assimilated that number of foreign born people. Even on a percentage basis, only 1890 and 1910 were higher.
53% of that number is naturalized American citizens. (Fig. 5 in the attachment).
That is an assimilation problem. No country on earth has ever assimilated that many immigrants peacefully (or violently, for that matter), we are simply in uncharted waters.
No, you have to teach the truth...That is an assimilation problem. No country on earth has ever assimilated that many immigrants peacefully (or violently, for that matter), we are simply in uncharted waters.
The implications of these data are two:
- The US should slow down the flow to buy time for assimilation of those already here. (The US have it easier than Europe. They are trying to assimilate people from countries with very different views of the relationship between the individual, the church, and the state, who write in a script other than Latin, to whom a Western view of the rights of the individual is not organic. We are trying to assimilate a lot of people from Latin America, at least nominally Christian, Latin script reading, Western in outlook.
- The US should work really hard to inspire love of country in those currently here. You cannot teach young people and new arrivals that the United States are an awful country while trying to assimilate that number.
Therein lies the rub. One man's truth is another man's folly. We can't even agree on facts in this country. If the Republican's did it then it is akin to fascism and if the Democrats did it then it came from their love of socialism.No, you have to teach the truth...
There has to be a middle ground between the 1619 Project and the "slavery had its good points" crowd.Therein lies the rub. One man's truth is another man's folly. We can't even agree on facts in this country. If the Republican's did it then it is akin to fascism and if the Democrats did it then it came from their love of socialism.
There is, but it doesn’t generate clicks and it doesn’t emotionally manipulate stupid people, so what good is it?There has to be a middle ground between the 1619 Project and the "slavery had its good points" crowd.
I believe teaching students the truth will cause students to see their country is the best in the world.No, you have to teach the truth...
My son just wrapped up the entire Calhoun Community College online American history course in under two weeks this summer—and walked away with the full 3 hours of credit.
Whether he actually learned anything (good, bad, truth, or not) is another story.
Thank you for this.There has to be a middle ground between the 1619 Project and the "slavery had its good points" crowd.