Joe Biden's administration releases information on transporting migrants on secret flights into the U.S. which could cause national security 'vulnerabilities' - and won't disclose where they are being flown.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Looks like the problem isn't limited to the border. I think I hear the fat lady warming up.
What a deceptive ball of lies.
Let's look at this:
Just below the headline:
- A lawsuit reveals Biden's CBP is refusing to disclose airports where it is flying undocumented aliens from other countries
Now this would make you think that these people were coming without authorization or legal right, which is not true. Look at their next bullet point:
- Biden's expansion of the CBP One app allows migrants to apply for asylum in their country, be flown to the U.S. and given two-years to obtain legal status
They again repeat the lie:
Use of a cell phone app has allowed for the near undetected arrival by air of 320,000
aliens with
no legal rights to enter the United States.
(bold assertion, Cotton)
Included in details of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit first reported by Todd Bensman,
the Center for Immigration Studies found Biden's CBP approved the latest secretive flights that transported hundreds of thousands of i
llegal immigrants from foreign countries into at least 43 different American airports from January through December 2023.
(again, bold assertion)
The program was part of Biden's expansion of the CBP One app, which kicked off at the start of last year.
Migrants were able, under Biden's expansion, to apply for asylum using the app from their home countries.
(which makes their entry completely legal under law)
But the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) notes that the transportation of these migrants directly to the U.S. is one of the lesser known uses of the app.
Aliens who cannot legally enter the U.S. use CBP One to apply for travel authorization and temporary humanitarian release from those airports.
Again, this makes their entry legal and gives them legal status as asylum seekers no matter how many times someone claims their entry is unlawful, illegal, undocumented, or any other buzzword that sends the ignorant into conniptions.
I thought it was illegal entries we were worried about.
Or was that a lie?
And do some of us wish to believe the lies in the article, which contradicts itself?