Bush Credibility Issues

[bwdial]

keats,
No, I think they'll be allowed to operate in other countries around the world, planning attacks with little monitoring from our intelligence agencies, due to cut funding under Kerry. I also think countries will be more willing to allow terrorist operations to be based within their borders if there is little, if any, threat of reprisal from our military. Honestly, do you think the North Koreans, Iranians and other terrorist regimes on this planet want to see Bush or Kerry get elected.

------------------
"There are few talents more richly rewarded with both wealth and power, in countries around the world, than the ability to convince backward people that their problems are caused by other people who are more advanced."

Thomas Sowell

 

[fosterkeats]

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by bwdial:
keats,
No, I think they'll be allowed to operate in other countries around the world, planning attacks with little monitoring from our intelligence agencies, due to cut funding under Kerry. I also think countries will be more willing to allow terrorist operations to be based within their borders if there is little, if any, threat of reprisal from our military. Honestly, do you think the North Koreans, Iranians and other terrorist regimes on this planet want to see Bush or Kerry get elected.

</font>

Your first assumption about Kerry cutting the military is false, he has never mentioned it AT ALL...

Your second assumption, which is in line with all the other Bush-lovers in hee, is that democrats are not as worried about mational security as republicans, which is a pharse...

All I have heard is blather about how worse 9/11 would have been if Gore were president... How is that even possible??? Would all the democrats have just sat around and done nothing??? That's where the ignorance of some Bush-ies really makes some of the "intelligent" conservatives look bad...

 

[bandersnatch45]

Kerry does not have to mention his votes to cut spending on national security. you can look it up in the Congressional Record. it's probably on-line...

 

[bandersnatch45]

it is quite clear that the dems are not concerned in the least with national security. their whole thought is centered on "defeat Bush" to the exclusion of all else. that alone is reason enough to keep Kerry out of the White House.

 

[crimsonman]

Correct on both points, "Bander"! I agree COMPLETELY!

 

[fosterkeats]

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by bandersnatch45:
it is quite clear that the dems are not concerned in the least with national security. their whole thought is centered on "defeat Bush" to the exclusion of all else. that alone is reason enough to keep Kerry out of the White House.</font>

You're soooooo right... Our only hope is to defeat Bush and open the flood gates for terrorists, illegals, and whoever else wants to march into America and corrupt it further...

Bring it on, more Oklahoma City bombings, 9/11 massacres, school shootings, post office crap shoots, we want it all...

You really have some reality issues if you believe that...

 

[bandersnatch45]

darn foster, i thot you were gonna call me an "ignorant hammerhead" or some such. yer slipping...

 

[TexasBama]

To think either the Democrats or Republicans have a franchise on ethics or credibility is naive.

 

[Mamacalled]

foster,
Why is it that you never respond to facts. I gave facts when I stated what Bush would do for me and you don't respond. Bandersnatch gives you facts that he has voted against military pay increases everytime, that he voted to cut the CIA's budget by $6 bil, and that he voted against refurbishing and building new military housing shows me that protecting our country is not a priority.
These are facts but you dodge these and respond only to personal attacks.