Debates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, its all about the time in office.:rolleyes:

Okay -- so using your logic.....if time in office doesn't matter -- he should have been able to come in and fix George's errors just by waving his magic stick right? I mean, if time in office doesn't matter why hasn't BHO fixed the country yet? Why is he asking FOR MORE TIME?
 
Funny how you all are so quick to blame BO for little 911 but hold GB blameless for big 911:rolleyes:

Please explain how the big 911 was GB's fault. That is a ridiculous statement when Bin Laden had attacked Americans the whole time Clinton was in office and he did nothing to stop him. Ninety percent of 911 was on Clinton, period.
 
Okay -- so using your logic.....if time in office doesn't matter -- he should have been able to come in and fix George's errors just by waving his magic stick right? I mean, if time in office doesn't matter why hasn't BHO fixed the country yet? Why is he asking FOR MORE TIME?
He is fixing GB's mess in the middle east. He has failed to do enough to fix GB's mess domestically.
 
He is fixing GB's mess in the middle east. He has failed to do enough to fix GB's mess domestically.

Fixing GB's mess in the middle east = Chaos in Egypt, Chaos in Libya, Chaos in Syria, Dead US Soldiers in Afghanistan (most killed by the Afghani Police Joe Biden says are ready to take over from our troops), and Iraq who has 5X more bomb making material since BHO took office......

And if you were wanting him to do MORE to fix the domestic issues -- just be glad he was so distracted by his Golf Game -- that he didn't spend more time on it.....otherwise we would really zooming along.
 
Please explain where I said it was.

Classic Liberal Response -- you know darn well your inference was that "we" hold GWB "blameless" for 911 -- suggests that you thought he should have been "blamed" for it.... and now.... "explain where I said it was" -- lol

You need to run for office.....
 
Soooo, you have no idea what Romney's actual position is on the issue and have no intention of finding out, so you arbitrarily decide he wants to occupy the middle east and kill US infrastructure then you try to criticize him on it without making any point. Did I get all that?

I said I fear, I did not say it would happen or even that I think it would happen. Its ZOMG ZOMG ZOMG he said something about the GOP. When did I criticize Mitt????? I have said worse things about Obama and never caught any heat.
 
So what makes you think Obama would invest in America? As I said earlier, he had 800 billion dollars to invest in infrastructure and decided to invest in unions and his campaign donors. Why would he do anything different this time?

Did I say Obama would? Please show me where I said Obama would invest in America. I would really like to see the post.
 
Classic Liberal Response -- you know darn well your inference was that "we" hold GWB "blameless" for 911 -- suggests that you thought he should have been "blamed" for it.... and now.... "explain where I said it was" -- lol

You need to run for office.....

No, my only inference was that it seems silly for those whose hold GB blameless for 911 to then turn around and blame BO for Libya.I never implied that either was or was not responsible for either.
 
Biden said that no one had requested additional security at the consulate in Benghazi. Yet, such a request had been forwarded to DC in June.
Either he and his boss are incompetent or they are aware and are lying to cover up that incompetence. Neither bodes well for their competence for the offices they seek.

And this comment has nothing to do with how he said it. It is solely based on what he said (and what he failed to do to secure the US Embassy).


Could this be one thing that was in one of the many National Security briefings that our President misses approx. 60% of the time? You know it was on the anniversary of 9/11 and in a world HOT SPOT! Was BO playing blackjack in Vegas at the time?
 
If Mitt wins I fear the U.S. will start nation building all over again in the Middle east, while our nation's infrastructure falls apart.

Did I say Obama would? Please show me where I said Obama would invest in America. I would really like to see the post.

If you aren't holding Obama to the same standard as you want to hold Romney to then I guess you aren't saying Obama would rebuild the infrastructure. My bad, I'm not sure why I expected a liberal to hold a Democrat to the same standards he wants to put on a Republican. Carry on.
 
It is like you guys know Romney can't win and you got butt hurt already. It is going to be a long four years for the GOP.

If Romney loses there will be plenty of "butt hurt" for everyone.....and it just may well be the last four years of the good ole USA....at least the one we used to know.....this isn't a game anymore. It isn't just some partisan politics.....it isn't Reagan and Tip sharing a bourbon and eating jelly beans.....there are some scary things going on in the "inner workings" of our Government.....and trying to stretch the rubberband that surrounds the Bill of Rights in one thing....but we are approaching things that seemed like a cheesy sci-fi movie only a few years ago.

(I have GOT to quit listening to Beck in the morning -- lol) ---

Going to bed....
 
You all apparently see what you want, not what was said.

Then your whole point was pointless. The big 911 was nothing like the little 911 and you know it. Obama had intelligence and did nothing. Obama blamed a video that had nothing to do with what was going on. Obama was asked to send more security and didn't. Now you counter with what Bush knew and should have done differently.
 
If you aren't holding Obama to the same standard as you want to hold Romney to then I guess you aren't saying Obama would rebuild the infrastructure. My bad, I'm not sure why I expected a liberal to hold a Democrat to the same standards he wants to put on a Republican. Carry on.

Swoop you have saw where I blasted Obama. I did not hold Mitt to any standard, at this point in time he is not the POTUS, there is no standard to hold him to.
 
Then your whole point was pointless. The big 911 was nothing like the little 911 and you know it. Obama had intelligence and did nothing. Obama blamed a video that had nothing to do with what was going on. Obama was asked to send more security and didn't. Now you counter with what Bush knew and should have done differently.

Wrong again. The point was that you all are being inconsistent with your complaints. As far as warnings go, both GB & BO received them.
 
Please explain how the big 911 was GB's fault. That is a ridiculous statement when Bin Laden had attacked Americans the whole time Clinton was in office and he did nothing to stop him. Ninety percent of 911 was on Clinton, period.

You know, I don't ever remember George Bush going around and blaming Slick Willie for all the problems that he confronted. Why has B. Obama been blaming GB for everything that happens in the world and in our nation? B. O. should be more like Harry Truman, "The Buck Stops Here!" "These bad things happened on my watch and I am responsible." I would have more respect for him if he did that instead of blaming someone else.

How do all the liberals / progressives on this board feel about Mr. Obama, as President of our country, bowing down to certain world leaders? Does that make you feel good about our President? I don't recall seeing him bow down to Mr. Netanyahu.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads