I made no judgement, just stated the facts. Sorry if it struck a nerve.Feel free to live in your little fantasy world.
I made no judgement, just stated the facts. Sorry if it struck a nerve.Feel free to live in your little fantasy world.
Oh, its all about the time in office.![]()
Funny how you all are so quick to blame BO for little 911 but hold GB blameless for big 911![]()
He is fixing GB's mess in the middle east. He has failed to do enough to fix GB's mess domestically.Okay -- so using your logic.....if time in office doesn't matter -- he should have been able to come in and fix George's errors just by waving his magic stick right? I mean, if time in office doesn't matter why hasn't BHO fixed the country yet? Why is he asking FOR MORE TIME?
Please explain where I said it was.Please explain how the big 911 was GB's fault. That is a ridiculous statement when Bin Laden had attacked Americans the whole time Clinton was in office and he did nothing to stop him. Ninety percent of 911 was on Clinton, period.
He is fixing GB's mess in the middle east. He has failed to do enough to fix GB's mess domestically.
Please explain where I said it was.
Soooo, you have no idea what Romney's actual position is on the issue and have no intention of finding out, so you arbitrarily decide he wants to occupy the middle east and kill US infrastructure then you try to criticize him on it without making any point. Did I get all that?
Funny how you all are so quick to blame BO for little 911 but hold GB blameless for big 911![]()
Please explain where I said it was.
So what makes you think Obama would invest in America? As I said earlier, he had 800 billion dollars to invest in infrastructure and decided to invest in unions and his campaign donors. Why would he do anything different this time?
Classic Liberal Response -- you know darn well your inference was that "we" hold GWB "blameless" for 911 -- suggests that you thought he should have been "blamed" for it.... and now.... "explain where I said it was" -- lol
You need to run for office.....
You all apparently see what you want, not what was said.You seem to be blaming GB or at least insinuating some blame here. If not then your first post makes no sense.
Biden said that no one had requested additional security at the consulate in Benghazi. Yet, such a request had been forwarded to DC in June.
Either he and his boss are incompetent or they are aware and are lying to cover up that incompetence. Neither bodes well for their competence for the offices they seek.
And this comment has nothing to do with how he said it. It is solely based on what he said (and what he failed to do to secure the US Embassy).
If Mitt wins I fear the U.S. will start nation building all over again in the Middle east, while our nation's infrastructure falls apart.
Did I say Obama would? Please show me where I said Obama would invest in America. I would really like to see the post.
It is like you guys know Romney can't win and you got butt hurt already. It is going to be a long four years for the GOP.
You all apparently see what you want, not what was said.
If you aren't holding Obama to the same standard as you want to hold Romney to then I guess you aren't saying Obama would rebuild the infrastructure. My bad, I'm not sure why I expected a liberal to hold a Democrat to the same standards he wants to put on a Republican. Carry on.
Then your whole point was pointless. The big 911 was nothing like the little 911 and you know it. Obama had intelligence and did nothing. Obama blamed a video that had nothing to do with what was going on. Obama was asked to send more security and didn't. Now you counter with what Bush knew and should have done differently.
Please explain how the big 911 was GB's fault. That is a ridiculous statement when Bin Laden had attacked Americans the whole time Clinton was in office and he did nothing to stop him. Ninety percent of 911 was on Clinton, period.