I was saying that there is a reasonable chance that that exchange was not fabricated. And if so, it would render some of the complaints about her much less meaningful or even irrelevant. That was the primary point of the post. I made it clear that there were serious cautions associated with the possibility that the exchange was legit.
So you were saying exactly the same thing I was saying. I'm still not sure about what you're arguing. Or were arguing. Or whatever.
I made it quite clear that I had not come to any conclusion regarding the issue. I had not chosen to believe any of these things.
...
If you had read the post carefully, it would have been clear by multiple statements that I did not choose to believe any of those things. In fact, I plainly stated that we needed to wait before coming to any conclusions.
I guess I should have been clearer. The only statement in my post I was directing at you was the first one. The rest were royal yous.